8 months after getting the jab, your immune function is lower than if you hadn't been jabbed at all
From that anti-vax fringe rag, The Lancet
Why is it that, for all other medical procedures I can think of, when they don’t work, people are no longer asked to take them. But when it comes to administration of vaccines or, in this case, experimental genetic modification injections, they are told to take more of them?
Lancet 2022; 399: 814–23
Background Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 beyond 6 months remains incompletely understood. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against the risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death during the first 9 months after vaccination for the total population of Sweden.
Findings: Between Dec 28, 2020, and Oct 4, 2021, 842 974 individuals were fully vaccinated (two doses), and were matched (1:1) to an equal number of unvaccinated individuals (total study cohort n=1 685 948). For the outcome SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity, the vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 waned progressively over time, from 92% (95% CI 92 to 93; p<0·001) at 15-30 days, to 47% (39 to 55; p<0·001) at 121-180 days, and to 23% (-2 to 41; p=0·07) from day 211 onwards. Waning was slightly slower for mRNA-1273, with a vaccine effectiveness of 96% (94 to 97; p<0·001) at 15-30 days and 59% (18 to 79; p=0·012) from day 181 onwards. Waning was also slightly slower for heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 plus an mRNA vaccine, for which vaccine effectiveness was 89% (79 to 94; p<0·001) at 15-30 days and 66% (41 to 80; p<0·001) from day 121 onwards. By contrast, vaccine effectiveness for homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine was 68% (52 to 79; p<0·001) at 15-30 days, with no detectable effectiveness from day 121 onwards (-19% [-98 to 28]; p=0·49). For the outcome of severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness waned from 89% (82 to 93; p<0·001) at 15-30 days to 64% (44 to 77; p<0·001) from day 121 onwards. Overall, there was some evidence for lower vaccine effectiveness in men than in women and in older individuals than in younger individuals.
Interpretation We found progressively waning vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity across all subgroups, but the rate of waning differed according to vaccine type. With respect to severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness seemed to be better maintained, although some waning became evident after 4 months. The results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for administration of a third vaccine dose as a booster. (Emphasis added)
Really? Actually, for anyone with more than 2 working brain cells, the results strengthen the evidence-based rationale for immediate withdrawal of all COVID jabs and further research into how to boost and strengthen the immune system so as not to be killed by the common cold. But maybe that’s just my idea?
What do you think?
Has any one come across the new vax tablet molnuporavir brand is lagevrio? They wanted my sister to take this apparently still under trial.
I guess you find what you are looking for and it's a choice as to how many of your brain cells you engage. So clear in the conclusion they draw the bias and worldview that exists in medical journals towards Big Pharma sponsored tech. You get what you pay for and the Holy Dove has been bought, sold and bought again as Leonard Cohen wrote. Of course in the real world that you and I live in it is perfectly obvious that the so called vaccines should be withdrawn immediately. One death in a group that is not at risk of the disease is one too many and we are talking about so many more this time. If we focused on what we know about supporting the innate immune system they wouldn't be able to whip up fear about getting the flu because nobody would believe it. Vive informed choice and the ethical resistance! Thanks for all that you do. (-: