Andrew Wakefield's Lancet Paper - Lancet Ombudsman "there is a scientific argument which is continuing and has yet to be sorted out to everyone’s satisfaction. "

If there was no evidence of fraud (and there wasn't), this paper should have been automatically reinstated and Poul Thorsen's 22 articles on the subject should have been retracted. But that's not the way medical journals work, is it? And the original retraction had nothing to do with the veracity of the information on this article - it was all about protecting vaccination policy at a terrible cost to the victims of autism and the tens of thousands who have unnecessarily regressed into autism since Wakefield et al's vilification.