Hi Jane - this is where I got it from but I don't think this is the original source - I do think it is an official UK Government table but am not sure?
I have been vaccinated many times throughout my working life. The last one caused a reaction leading to my dismissal due to inattention to my duties. Before the dismissal, I saw several doctors who did not see any problems with me. I did not mention the inoculations.
However, I am in charge of MY health.
In this particular case (Covid19) I stay out of it because it is an "Emergency use only" approval, leading me to say: you got to have rocks in your head to get the injection.
You are right - but the problem is that most people were never told that this is an experimental jab that can't even be called a vaccine. And they never asked because for some reason, they trust the government and their doctors. The only silver lining to this dark COVID cloud is that the lies and betrayal of trust that has been perpetrated by the government, medical community and media has turned a lot of people who never asked questions before into dedicated health researchers who will never just 'follow orders' again.
Thank you, Meryl. We were all told, however people don't take notice. By that I mean ignorance and reliance on Government (the least authority) fail you to make an informed decision. I have made my own decision, if you don't like it, that is YOUR problem not mine.
I sent a TheExposeUK article to one of the Aussie experts today. He replied! And my response. Read from the bottom up.
------------------------
Dear Dr X
Being a scientific and medical layman, I am not in a position to read these studies. I rely on my sources to collate and parse them for me. I read the "gist" of the articles my sources produce.
Re "scientifically credible sources"
This phrase is as normative and, therefore, as a oxymoronic as it could be.
I am happy to debate this matter with you as a layman. I still fondly remember that in 2020 Nature published a "study" on C19 where n = 9!
My sources had brought to my attention a few studies published in The Lancet, NEJM, etc where the abstracts and conclusions were not supported by the data therein.
Of course, we know that at least 50% of published papers could not be reproduced. And some whose data were plainly bogus.
Finally, we remember The Lancet paper using the Surgisphere data on HCQ. Did you know that a marketing staff of Surgisphere was a former French porn actress? Sacre bleu!
----------------------
That is not what the study says, but appreciate that ‘The Expose’ is not a scientifically credible source
What a cop-out! The source is not the issue - if the same information was published in the Lancet, he would find another excuse to discount it. Keep going though Barry - the paper trail alone is worth the effort. He can never say he wasn't told.
We have seen a pattern with those people, online and offline. They will use any little angle to wiggle out. The solutions are: 1. Water-tight arguments. 2. Use their own arguments against them.
Like I did when he dissed TheExpose as a source, I laid out a few facts he could not deny.
He replied. I replied. He replied again! All primp and proper.
The dissatisfaction is that he declined my previous challenge to debate him on his advice to McGuwan. In short, he won't engage in any substantive debate.
Some "experts" have blocked me or asked me to cease and desist. The WA Health Dept, Qld premier and Health; Qld opposition have blocked me.
However, WA's CHO Dr Robertson tried to "educate" me about monkeypox. When I sent him my readings, he was silent!
I challenged him to a debate over his advice to the WA govt that the faccines were effective. I even offered to go first. He declined. That was the last comm from him.
In 2021 and early 2022, Professor Peter Collignon replied. Of course, he could not answer a few basic question. I made a boo-boo by calling him a quack intended to someone else! Since then he had not replied to me.
I wondered about him a lot over this last 2 years. He risked his career and his reputation to question the flu jab and yet with COVID, it was toeing the part line that was important. I didn't have his email address (and he didn't used to work for the government which could explain his apparent change of heart on this issue?) but it's worth reaching out. I'll let you know if he replies - thanks!
What is the source of this article especially the graph? TIA
Hi Jane - this is where I got it from but I don't think this is the original source - I do think it is an official UK Government table but am not sure?
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/09/covid-vaccine-causing-sudden-adult-death-syndrome/?cmid=b359eca0-14f1-41eb-b9d9-2c9a612ef37d
I have been vaccinated many times throughout my working life. The last one caused a reaction leading to my dismissal due to inattention to my duties. Before the dismissal, I saw several doctors who did not see any problems with me. I did not mention the inoculations.
However, I am in charge of MY health.
In this particular case (Covid19) I stay out of it because it is an "Emergency use only" approval, leading me to say: you got to have rocks in your head to get the injection.
You are right - but the problem is that most people were never told that this is an experimental jab that can't even be called a vaccine. And they never asked because for some reason, they trust the government and their doctors. The only silver lining to this dark COVID cloud is that the lies and betrayal of trust that has been perpetrated by the government, medical community and media has turned a lot of people who never asked questions before into dedicated health researchers who will never just 'follow orders' again.
Thank you, Meryl. We were all told, however people don't take notice. By that I mean ignorance and reliance on Government (the least authority) fail you to make an informed decision. I have made my own decision, if you don't like it, that is YOUR problem not mine.
I've been sending some SADS posts to over 100 Aussie pollies, and over 25 "experts".
Please do let us know if you get any response from them. I'm not holding my breath...
I sent a TheExposeUK article to one of the Aussie experts today. He replied! And my response. Read from the bottom up.
------------------------
Dear Dr X
Being a scientific and medical layman, I am not in a position to read these studies. I rely on my sources to collate and parse them for me. I read the "gist" of the articles my sources produce.
Re "scientifically credible sources"
This phrase is as normative and, therefore, as a oxymoronic as it could be.
I am happy to debate this matter with you as a layman. I still fondly remember that in 2020 Nature published a "study" on C19 where n = 9!
My sources had brought to my attention a few studies published in The Lancet, NEJM, etc where the abstracts and conclusions were not supported by the data therein.
Of course, we know that at least 50% of published papers could not be reproduced. And some whose data were plainly bogus.
Finally, we remember The Lancet paper using the Surgisphere data on HCQ. Did you know that a marketing staff of Surgisphere was a former French porn actress? Sacre bleu!
----------------------
That is not what the study says, but appreciate that ‘The Expose’ is not a scientifically credible source
What a cop-out! The source is not the issue - if the same information was published in the Lancet, he would find another excuse to discount it. Keep going though Barry - the paper trail alone is worth the effort. He can never say he wasn't told.
We have seen a pattern with those people, online and offline. They will use any little angle to wiggle out. The solutions are: 1. Water-tight arguments. 2. Use their own arguments against them.
Like I did when he dissed TheExpose as a source, I laid out a few facts he could not deny.
He replied. I replied. He replied again! All primp and proper.
The dissatisfaction is that he declined my previous challenge to debate him on his advice to McGuwan. In short, he won't engage in any substantive debate.
Some "experts" have blocked me or asked me to cease and desist. The WA Health Dept, Qld premier and Health; Qld opposition have blocked me.
However, WA's CHO Dr Robertson tried to "educate" me about monkeypox. When I sent him my readings, he was silent!
I challenged him to a debate over his advice to the WA govt that the faccines were effective. I even offered to go first. He declined. That was the last comm from him.
In 2021 and early 2022, Professor Peter Collignon replied. Of course, he could not answer a few basic question. I made a boo-boo by calling him a quack intended to someone else! Since then he had not replied to me.
If you email him, he might reply:
peter.collignon@act.gov.au
I wondered about him a lot over this last 2 years. He risked his career and his reputation to question the flu jab and yet with COVID, it was toeing the part line that was important. I didn't have his email address (and he didn't used to work for the government which could explain his apparent change of heart on this issue?) but it's worth reaching out. I'll let you know if he replies - thanks!
His address is public info:
andrew.robertson@health.wa.gov.au