LifeHealth Choices Open Letter to Doctors who Attack Those Concerned About Vaccines
This letter is written in response to Dr. Albert Fuchs who wrote a February 5, 2010 post entitled Twelve Years Later, The Truth About Vaccines and Autism for his blog Nice Jewish Doctor.
Dear Dr. Fuchs and Dr. G.N. who isn’t brave enough to use his real name,
You benefit from the tremendous courtesy extended to you as physicians and medical doctors. The basis of your professional status in society rests upon the confidence people place in your credential, the training and study behind it, and the bottom line belief that you are worthy of their trust.
You, and your fellow medical colleagues who, astonishingly, stoop to insult concerned and probing individuals, are an abomination and your behavior begs the question of your motivations. Do you demand passive and obedient patients? It goes against everything you were taught as a student of science and medicine. Observation is the first step in scientific inquiry. The pursuit of scientific knowledge did not end the precise moment you obtained your MD.
Let’s say that, every single time after eating a certain kind of food, you vomit and you have wretched diarrhea, fever and abdominal pain. What if you are told the food is good for you and you must eat it because it could save your life? Other people seem to do well with the food, so you press on. But each time, after you eat it, your health deteriorates. Would you keep eating the food? Would you give it to your children, who experience the same symptoms? What if you started to research the food and you learn that some have been compensated because of harm/death caused by this food? What if you discovered that many people who are sick like you ate the same food?
What if the people you trusted the most began to call you terrible names because you exercised your right not to eat this food?
No matter the agenda of your august colleagues and medical associations, you owe it to your patients to tell them that the jury is still out regarding the long-term health outcomes of vaccination. There is a bill languishing in Congress that seeks to compare the unvaccinated versus the vaccinated. The CDC is about to launch a National Children’s Study that follows over 100,000 mother-baby pairs for twenty years to observe the effects of toxic chemical exposures, excluding vaccines and the toxic chemical ingredients in vaccines, such as mercury and aluminum. Why exclude vaccines?
There are laws protecting our rights as individuals and parents. These are foundational principles of this country and defend our right to individual security, individual autonomy, and the ability to safeguard our person. Government attempts to mandate or force vaccines rest solely on the premise of public health emergencies. So let’s go through the shots, one by one, and investigate whether the true public health crisis in this country is one of chickenpox, seasonal flu, polio, Hepatitis B, cervical cancer, measles, Hepatitis A, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (and 7 others). Or whether the true public health crisis today is that we have the infant mortality rate of a Third World country, chronic illness is through the roof, fully 1% of our children now have autism, and in response to all these shocking statistics…
you and your finger-pointing colleagues have absolutely no idea why.
Sirs, if you cannot support that science must be pursued without prejudice… and if you cannot accept that there are laws that protect individual rights including those that permit us to protect our very lives… at least do your profession and the rest of us a service and keep your mouths shut.
Sincerely yours,
Louise Kuo Habakus