6 Comments

Exactly so, Meryl!

Pfizer rep, Ms Small says, ""We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what was taking place in the market and from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk." (meaning - Pfizer's FINANCIAL risk - not the risk of harm or loss of life)

Press conference follow up with MEP Cristian Terhes and colleagues:

https://youtu.be/2jTgDj7uiX8

In 2015, David Vaughn (GSK Vaccines):

"... noted there was “the luxury” of extending the timelines, as there was no current pandemic demanding the final product. In this case the BLA was ultimately submitted, but he cautioned that, in some cases, a project is never seen to completion without the immediate demand. Vaughn also stressed the importance of considering pediatric development from the onset."

At the same 2015 conference, Peter Daszak:

“Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs (medical countermeasures) such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process,’ Daszak stated.”

Pfizer - biggest fines in history

Pfizer - $40b profits in the past 12+ months

Pfizer - set to release new vxns for viruses that don't even exist yet (Daily Mail, Oct 8, 2022)

Australian citizens can sue govt for misuse of funds:

According to p. 556 of Hank's "Australian Constitutional Law" identifies the standing of individual citizens, as tax payers, to sue the govt for wrongful use of funds (e.g. bulk purchase of death shots), since this misappropriation and reckless waste of funds will impact their taxes in the future.

Case referenced is 'Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968)'

For anyone wearing their thinking caps - this could also be an avenue for accountability re: 'green energy' - inadequately researched, debated and cost/benefit analysed - heavily taxing and taxed.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you S! And you know what, it will only take one or two concerned legal professionals to take on board what you've said and to mount the actions suggested to finally put these pollies and industries on notice that, regardless of the insane profits they have reaped in their criminal actions, they will never have enough funds to pay for the compensation claims that will ensue! Any takers out there?

Expand full comment

I've sent a summary to Sen Rennick. Given his background in accounting, I've asked if he knows any tax lawyers who could build a case.

We can make some noise about this.

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2022Liked by Meryl Dorey

I have seen a number of different videos including one of Dr Robert Malone explaining Mass Formation Psychosis, and it would seem to explain why so many were sucked in by the lies about the jab, sadly it is yet another thing being censored by the lying MSM and big tech

Expand full comment
author

Yes, that is true. And I've read Mattias Desmet's book on The Psychology of Totalitarianism (highly recommended) and it explains very clearly why the majority of the population was taken in so easily by these incredibly obvious (to us) lies. It's time they realised it. Because if they don't, the next big event - be it climate change, or monkeypox or war with some imagined enemy - will most likely kill them and take us along for the ride.

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2022Liked by Meryl Dorey

Sadly though from what I have heard from those sources they can't be woken up, they have to come to the realisation themselves, I pray that that does happen and happen soon or we are as you stated all at risk

Expand full comment