The Government Really Doesn't Like Us Very Much...
The Government Really Doesn't Like Us Very Much...
Do you really think that the scamdemic was the first time our governments tried to kill us? Think again. Actually THINK full stop!
The following information was inspired by the video above by Defender of the Republic on YouTube and compiled by Just-Ice.
It is sobering to understand that our governments really don’t care whether we - the taxpayers who keep them in office and who they are supposed to represent and protect - live or die. In fact, according to all the available information, I believe they would generally prefer if we die.
Is the government a terrorist cabal worse than the Nazis, Al Kaida, Mao or Stalin? The fact that I can’t answer that question really means to me that it is.
A Selection of Government Harms against the People
By no means an exhaustive list, below is a collection of some instances where government and associated officials and entities delivered egregious harms on unwitting groups of people. The decision-makers either had foreknowledge, or progressive awareness of harms. In all cases, harms continued regardless of this knowledge.
While the majority of the list below cites events in USA, just as with the COVID-19 response, at least a percentage of these historic abuses were mirrored or extended elsewhere. The only conclusion has nothing to be with borders, but with the required shock and alarm that supposedly civilised elected officials have an astonishing track record of abuse of human rights.
Please note from examples below the remarkable similarities to the COVID response mentality, divisiveness, and discrimination.
1920-33, Government poisons alcohol sources during prohibition, thousands die, hundreds of thousands harmed
1915-40s, the Pellagra Incident, officials withheld known cures for two decades to a diet deficiency disease, making it the 8th leading cause of death at the time
1947, Radioactive experiments on humans, carried out over many years on the same population, govt suppressed data on adverse reactions to avoid legal accountability
1932-72, The Tuskegee Experiment, doctors purposely withheld treatment from hundreds of unwitting 'volunteers', subjecting them to unnecessary terrible suffering, disabilities and death, with innocent secondary impacts on spouses and children
1956-61, The Thalidomide disaster, a supposedly harmless drug that was never properly tested, and 'hidden' in other medication caused the miscarriages and malformations of babies; subsequent testing proved its diabolical impact and thus regulatory rules were revolutionised (except one must wonder why they have been abandoned in current times)
1966, Germ Warfare tested in NYC subways at peak hour, officials withheld information from police, transit authorities, and the public; one of 239 experiments conducted on unwitting populace by the military over a 20-year period
1996, Measle vaccine - undisclosed risks, unlicensed vaccine tested in Africa and Haiti with concerning increase in death rate among female infants; later used on 1500 minority infants in US - no warnings given to parents
Digging into the minutia (not all details in this doc), it is interesting to see the same baseline tactics/responses in the bigger actions:
fear campaign
tribalise, with prejudice and divisive language, smearing and segregation
promote singular 'safe' solutions while suppressing others
shoddy / absent testing
180 degree pivots on what is 'for your good'
pushing for profits, and ends justifies means mentality
minority speaking against it are pilloried
And so on ... very familiar to us by now.
For the more complete list, download the PDF:
Click the download button below to read the rest of the outrages against innocent citizens. And keep in mind that this is far from a complete list - not even close.
The elite decided long ago that there are simply too many unimportant people on earth. We are beneath them. They believe it is their duty, their manifest responsibility, to manage the world population so as to preserve the earth’s resources for themselves, the only “worthy” ones. This concept is not new. They have for generations now openly expressed their desire to shrink the world population by various means. They start wars, engineer shortages, deliberately induce infertility and disease, contaminate the water/air/food, etc -- because it would be a far messier and riskier thing for them to overtly drag the unwashed masses into the streets before firing squads or into gas chambers. They know how outnumbered they are. So they dumb down the citizenry, elicit your trust, pretend to care about your health and safety, promise “solutions,” all while stabbing you in the back (while picking your pocket, I might add). And because millions of people (if not actual billions) of people cooperate/comply, they believe they have your tacit consent. In their view, it’s your fault that you are so easily duped anyway, and by leaving this planet sooner than later, you are performing a service for “The Greater Good.” And saving the planet as a bonus! Although saving the planet for whom or what remains to be seen -- because your descendants are of no greater value to them than you are in the present.
Jesus said, “The thief (Satan) comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” John 10:10
The scamdemic was merely a write-off of beneficiaries.
What presents as "Government" is merely a private corporation given the duty to administer a bankruptcy of the de jure Commonwealth of Australia.
The people of the de jure Commonwealth of Australia granted Parliament the authority (which the Constitution didn't ) to deal with the Financial Emergencies of the late 1920's and early 1930's in the Referendum of 1928.
The solution Parliament employed was in effect an act of treachery, but since none of the people challenged it in a meaningful way, it must have been ok.
Parliament's solution was to place the assets of the people in trust, and through the mechanism of creating a look-a-like corporate entity, entice the people to abandon the inherent jurisdiction of the Commonwealth where Common Law existed and the people had unalienable rights, so that they occupied a position in the newly formed legal jurisdiction which was inhabited by corporations, corporate soles and other fictions of law.
When a sovereign Government ceases using money of substance and instead begins to use fiat currency, it has in effect surrendered its claim of sovereignty (Queen/King of Australia anyone?)
And when it registers itself as a corporation on a foreign Corporations register, it unambiguously has no rightful claim to any sovereignty.
But it does have dominion over it's creations, including any people who by election, pretend to be one of those creations.
If you rely on a Birth Certificate as a form of id, then that is you.
Know the Birth Certificate for what it is, and know that with the right knowledge and process of law and equity, it's source can be made the kernel of a private trust whereby you control that private corporation !