Your letters to the Glamorgan Council (Part 1)
I doubt that this individual or this council ever had as many intelligent, well-researched correspondence in its entire history! Please keep them coming :-)
This follows on from yesterday’s post about the Glamorgan/Spring Bay Council refusing a parking permit to the VaxXed Bus because they manage 2 vaccination clinics. A lot of you wrote to the General Manager, Greg Ingham, about this subject and have cc’d me at admin@myinformedchoice.com.au.
I am going to share your correspondence here. If you haven’t yet written, feel free to take some ideas from these letters - I’m sure the authors won’t mind. Just be sure to add your own words too.
Mr Ingham and council members,
re: AVN bus visit
I am not associated with the AVN organisation. I am an independent researcher, living on the mainland. I network and source information, locally, nationally and internationally, across a range of fields and experts, including law, health and human interests.
It is with grave concerns that I am alerted of your council's well-publicised bias and prejudice, in refusing public access to the AVN victim support, and freedom of information and speech.
Since your email expressed no uncertain terms, your approach can only be seen as discriminatory. You are contributing to medical apartheid. And, possibly - through limiting people's ability to access information - your decision increases their risk for harm through forced ignorance.
You have a duty of care to all residents and members of the public. In conflict with your rejection of AVN, your own website's Vision statement is open and inclusive. Extract:
Attract and welcome people of all backgrounds, cultures and ages to live in our region.
Take an East Coast perspective but also acknowledge the differing needs and priorities of each town or area.
Draw on the knowledge and expertise of local people and communities in shaping and delivering our initiatives and plans – listening to and taking account of ideas and feedback from residents, businesses and ratepayers.
Since discrimination does not seem to be part of your council's mission statement, how is it that you award yourselves the power to limit people's access to freedom of expression, freedom of information, freedom of choice?
Are the other councillors aware that you have sent a missive of such nature, on their behalf and in their name, perhaps without their full awareness of consent? E.G.
Have they each received a copy of AVN's introductory email, with the invitation to share more information?
And have they had adequate time to look into the services offered and the testimonies of the people seeking support?
You claim that your region has two medical practices, and these you deem adequate for disseminating health information. This raises vital questions:
Can you guarantee that these medical practices are not being suppressed, under threat of fines and loss of license - as has happened to some Australian and overseas doctors who have given established and proven health advice that happens to go against the current government narrative?
Your own response - which is a form of censorship - would suggest that you might be comfortable with the censorship of doctors, who otherwise are extremely challenged in doing the vital work they have been trained for - given the ever-changing narrative of govt mismanagement of the situation
Are you aware:
of the many whistle-blowers in the healthcare system who have exposed the top-down bullying from govt and entities, and of
the lawsuits underway - and being won by the plaintiffs?
Jan 17, 2023 New York Judge blocks COVID-19 mandates (source: National Law Review)
"... ruling that the New York State Dept of Health (DOH) acted outside its authority and noting that 'the COVID-19 shots do not prevent transmission.' "
Are you aware of the Vaccine harm compensation schemes that exist in Australia and overseas?
Services Australia: "You may be able to get financial support if you've experienced harm because of a COVID-19 vaccine or its administration."
just because harm has not happened to someone in your circle, does not mean it hasn't happened
just because the govt said the C-19 injections were safe and effective doesn't mean they are.
(AVN will be able to provide you and your councillors, and anyone interested, with real-world data to clarify any questions you might have.)
for whatever reason (see drug companies' criminal history) just because the govt gave false information about the C-19 injections, doesn't mean there hasn't been false information with previous vaccines
Pfizer's criminal history, (source: Matthew & Associates, law firm) extract:
"What we do know, from legal history, is that Pfizer's past transgressions might lead some reasonable people to question whether or not they will submit to any vaccine made by the company."
People have the right to ask questions and to get information to help them make quality decisions about their health.
Can you guarantee that every single resident of your regions are in receipt of whatever information your medical practices might or might not be aligned with? Such information would include standard warnings and details of side effects, risks, death
Can you guarantee that every person is in receipt of information regarding possible side effects from any vaccine/injection for any number of reasons?
allergies
compromised immune system
other conditions and medications that might prompt a conflict in drug interaction
family history of conditions that put a person at risk
pregnancy safety
neurological imbalances
latent diseases
vascular / nerve discrepancies
etc.
Can you guarantee that your medical practitioners are up to date with and able to disseminate the latest real-world data and evidence of safety/concerns - even if it goes beyond the govt's current narrative (which, to say the least, seems to lag)?
Are you comfortable with any harms / injuries / death experienced by people who have not been able to access vital information because of your rejection of the AVN support team?
These are just a few of the legal, moral, ethical concerns raised by your decision to limit access to information and support.
Mr Ingham - there is no right or wrong here. There is only good or bad.
Good being: transparency, openness, acceptance, support, solutions, options, inclusion, encouragement, growth, wellbeing, empowerment
Bad being: poor / faulty decision-making, lack of information, restriction, suppression, denial, exclusion, pressuring, ignorance, arrogance, missing information, obfuscation, abuse, presumption, prejudice, discrimination
For many reasons, you have a duty of care to all residents. In good conscience and professional responsibility, I hope you reconsider and the open the space to support people, in getting assistance and recognition, and/or in making choices that could save them from serious harms.
In all earnestness,
SK
A follow-up from the same author:
Mr Ingham,
Sharing a quick follow up to my email yesterday.
Since you claim confidence that the medical centres in your region are informing residents of the latest information, can you confirm that they areensuring everyone is aware of yet another relevant expert urging caution?
“BREAKING: Eminent MIT Prof & expert on drug safety analytics @RetsefL calls for immediate suspension of all covid mRNA vaccines ‘They should stop because they cause an unprecedented level of harm including the death of young people and children’ This is huge �� @elonmusk”
Please note: "... they cause an unprecedented level of harm including the death of young people and children."
Residents in your regions have the right to this vital information, and to any assistance AVN can give them to better understanding what they should know when making responsible choices about their health.
Thank you in anticipation of your fulfilment of your council's duty of care in ensuring this vital information is made available.
In full encouragement for positive outcomes,
SK
I am disgusted at your response to Meryl Dorey. The Vaxxed bus and its' team of volunteers provides a service to the community that should by rights be provided by the government. ie listening to and recording the experiences of people who have followed the medical "rules" and got vaccinated only to suffer injury, some very severe, or even death. There are a number or residents of the Glamorgan area who wish to attend this facility. So far in the bus's history of tours, any opposition from councils who may I say are sadly uninformed, has been met with offers of private land and no visits have been cancelled. All you are doing is making things difficult for your rate-paying residents.
We as a free democratic country are well aware of the criminal activity committed by the regime. The world's people and the walls are closing in on their agenda. We all are waking up to the corrupt economical forum.It is falling apart please be aware that no matter how much money and how much tax cuts the agenda has given you, it will not save your sorry soul we the people have the Magna Carta and the truth on our side lies can never ever be hidden the truth is always awake you may find it hard to sleep at night that's why our premiers are growing very old very fast wake up the worm is turning and when it does everyone will jump ship and we will see y all burning. We are not alone be brave alot is happening.
JJ
Good morning Greg
It is with great disappointment I read your response to the request by Meryl Dorey to bring the Vax bus project to your town There is mounting evidence the mRNA vaccines are causing significant levels of harm to children and adults. The data released by governments globally supports this along with increasing injuries , deaths and high levels of excess mortality and hundreds of thousands of injuries and deaths being reported to Government Adverse Event databases. People are hurt, they have a right to speak out and be heard. You have no business censoring them. You were offered an opportunity to demonstrate your credentials as a true Australian who supports Australians being able to speak freely, without judgement as long as that speech is not hateful. Now you are in the process of being outed as nothing more than a petty bureaucrat exercising overreach and censorship of the Glamorgan, Tasmania population. So with all due respect, I request you reverse your decision and provide a space for Meryl's bus so that the people of Glamorgan who have something to say, have an outlet to say it without the fear of persecution which you have decided to wholeheartedly implement and support.
Regards
SD
Hi Greg
I am a qualified scientist (physicist) and know many people who have experienced issues with the new novel rna vaccines. I have previously recommended people at risk get vaccinated but have now formed the scientific view that the risks outweigh the benefits for most people. In fact the UK advisory body has just recommended that no further covid vaccines should be taken by healthy under 50’s because of the significant risk profile of RNA vaccines. In that context I am surprised at your heavy handed and ill informed decision to prevent people in your area voicing their legitimate concerns. It is not your place to sensor scientific inquiry and community depate. Please reconsider your decision regards
RH
Dear Mr Ingham
As a concerned Australian citizen, I appeal to you to allow the AVN VaxXed Bus to park in the vicinity of your shire.
This bus and volunteers are in support of your residents.
As the government, media and big pharma have not been open and honest about the covid-19 injections, the AVN have evidence and data to show and tell the TRUTH and EVIDENCE of the destruction of the c-19 jabs.
The c-19 injections are poisonous and toxic. The jabs enter the veins and the chemicals travel to every organ in the body. How aware are you of the sudden deaths? The cardiac arrests?
The c-19 jabs are dangerous, destructive and deadly. The pharmacists are funding DEATHS.
In support of the AVN VaxXed Bus I appeal for a public parking bay please.
Kindly acknowledge receipt.
Sincerely
JB
Dear Mr Ingham
I refer to your letter forwarded to me by Meryl Dorey today.
The letter refers to two medical practices managed by the Glamorgan/Spring Bay Council.
I am astonished to learn that ratepayers have invested, with or without their knowledge, in a commercial enterprise managed by their local Council (many people would consider this as a conflict of interests).
I am horrified to understand from your letter, that through this commercial venture, decisions are being made on ratepayers/patients behalf, which deny them their right of informed choice -- a legal requirement with medical procedures. Doctors at these practices may be held legally responsible for not fully informing patients of possible risks with experimental mRNA vaccines.
You may not be aware that, according to figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and the international Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) there is now an horrific rise in deaths and severe illness following "vaccinations" and a 72% drop in the birthrate, in Australia.
https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676;
;
Clearly you wish to censor any suggestion of informed choice for your patients/ratepayers when they are considering taking an injection which could have serious consequences to their health for the rest of their lives. Even the Australia Medical Association's Code of Ethics, section 1-1 (y) says that the patient must be 'fully informed'; section 1-2 (Clinical Research) (a) to (d) says the same thing. The new technology, mRNA "vaccines" are still in the experimental (research) stage, having been rushed through at "warp speed" because of Covid. The manufacturers have now admitted they do not prevent people from getting Covid or transmitting it. The high rate of death and injury occurring in the days, weeks and months following the so-called "vaccines" indicate that the "cure" is worse than the complaint.
Australian Vaccination-risks Network would provide your ratepayers/patients with information about the risks of the Covid-19 "vaccinations" (from its stockpile of 1,000 peer reviewed medical studies) without bias or conflict of interest. AVN is NOT "anti-vaccination" but rather provides an alternative viewpoint from which your ratepayers/patients can make an informed choice.
Kind regards,
KB
Due to word limits in Substack, I will only post this much now and will upload more in separate posts. Please remember to cc me at admin@myinformedchoice.com.au when writing to Greg Ingham.
Your letters to the Glamorgan Council (Part 1)
could not agree more, i always enjoy reading such intelligent correspondence
You and your team are doing wonderful work Meryl.