Another day, another COVID backflip.

SAGE has changed its recommendations for COVID jabs and 'boosters' Pay no attention to the WHO behind the curtain.

Photo by Ben Dutton on Unsplash

Eight days ago, I published a Substack about sweeping changes in recommendations for COVID jabs for those under 65 years of age in Australia. (Has Hell Frozen Over? ATAGI Recommends no boosters for children under 5 and hedges their bets for those under 65!)

Now, I see that SAGE, the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation (God save us from ‘experts’ such as these!) has made similar changes to their recommendations. Maybe the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) got the memo early and let the cat out of the bag before they were supposed to.

Never mind, the media hasn’t reported on this anyway so no harm done, right?

What were the changes SAGE made?

In the release, issued yesterday entitled SAGE updates COVID-19 vaccination guidance, there were some interesting statements and recommendations, supposedly made due to “…the impact of Omicron and high population-level immunity due to infection and vaccination.”

So, we have an admission that you can develop immunity after natural infection? Yet the WHO and all other alphabet agencies have spent the last 3 years denying this was possible! Interesting.

• The roadmap newly considers the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination for those at lower risk – namely healthy children and adolescents – compared to other health interventions.
  But, but, but! We’ve been told over and over again since adding children aged 5-11 to the schedule and later, those aged 6 months and up, that COVID kills kids. Now, they are at lower risk?

• The roadmap also includes revised recommendations on additional booster doses and the spacing of boosters. The current COVID-19 vaccines’ reduction of post-COVID conditions is also considered but the evidence on the extent of their impact is inconsistent.
  Ho ho! Isn’t this a shocking admission? Maybe the jabs should have been tested for efficacy before they were released to every man and his dog. Now they are stating that evidence of their impact is ‘inconsistent’. I disagree. The evidence is VERY consistent. Whilst SARS COV-2 has not been shown to have made even one person ill or killed anyone, the COVID jabs have killed millions and injured in the hundreds of millions worldwide. As intended.

• “Countries should consider their specific context in deciding whether to continue vaccinating low risk groups, like healthy children and adolescents, while not compromising the routine vaccines that are so crucial for the health and well-being of this age group.” 
  So here we have the REAL reason for this change in policy - and it shows a bright light at the end of this tunnel. Because people no longer trust anything the WHO, the TGA, the AMA or the Government is telling them, they aren’t getting the ‘normal’ childhood vaccines for their kids. Over and over again on the VaxXed bus tours in NSW, VIC and TAS, people told me that, though they never questioned any vaccines before, they would no no longer take another jab nor would they give it to their children. The WHO has jumped the shark and it’s now too late to claw back that trust - it’s gone!

You can read the entire statement at the link above, but it will be interesting to see what the outcome is - and how long mandates for these pathetic injections remain in place.

If your employer is still mandating COVID jabs, send them a copy of this substack and ask why they think they know more about the necessity and safety of COVID jabs than the World Health Organisation. Include my last post on this topic showing the changes from the TGA as a kicker. People need to be shocked into thinking again - this might just be the impetus they need to give up on tyranny. Please let me know if you do this and what response you get.