As #placentagate so clearly shows, COVID jabs are killing babies and our governments are allowing this to continue
It is a crime against humanity-one of many. Thank you to Jikkyleaks and the Mouse Army for never giving up on sharing this information!
Pregnancy used to be a time when women were told to reduce their exposure to anything which might - even remotely - cause harm to their unborn child.
Don’t eat tuna!
Don’t eat soft cheese!
Don’t drink any wine or other alcohol!
Don’t take so much as an aspirin or a panadol unless it’s an absolute emergency!
There is a very good reason for this advice. Medicine has form when it comes to causing massive injuries and deaths to unborn babies.
The lessons of Thalidomide unlearned
In the 1950s, a drug called Thalidomide was created by the German pharmaceutical company, Grünenthal.
Women in the UK and Australia (amongst other countries) were given scripts for the drug. Within a very short time, reports emerged of babies born to these women with horrendous birth defects. You can read a pretty comprehensive list of known problems caused by Thalidomide on this page.
Why weren’t these effects known before the drug was prescribed to pregnant women? In order to determine the effects of a drug, chemical or other substance on a foetus, the product needs to undergo tests for potential genotoxicity or teratogenicity - in other words - its ability to cause genetic changes and mutations.
Thalidomide never underwent trials to determine its ability to cause genetic problems so when the problems began to occur, it was both unexpected and unwelcome news. Neither the government nor its health regulators had exercised their duty of care before allowing this new and untested treatment to be distributed to women at the most vulnerable time in their own and their infant’s lives.
It is estimated that at least 10,000 babies in Germany alone were affected with double that number affected in other countries. Probably 50% of these babies died within the first year of birth. Many of these former Thalidomide babies are still alive today, but it took decades before the real harm was acknowledged and the doctor who first alerted scientists to the connection between the drug and birth defects - Australian OB/GYN William McBride - had his career and reputation nearly destroyed because he spoke out. In other words, he was Wakefielded.
It was later discovered that these deadly effects were known about and covered up for many months prior to it being made public - with many mothers unnecessarily receiving the drug. Sound familiar?
Diethylstilbestrol (DES)
There have been other drugs since that time that have been prescribed for pregnant women without proper testing, causing issues in both the women themselves and their unborn children. DES comes to mind - a drug that had originally been licensed in the 1940s to prevent miscarriage. Within a relatively short time, it was found that DES was ineffective and fell out of favour. Sadly, too late for the millions of women who had taken the drug which, like Thalidomide, had never been tested for its teratogenetic effects.
By the 1970s, it was found that the daughters born to women who had been prescribed DES during pregnancy were having serious fertility issues and were at a greatly-increased risk of certain cancers.
A friend of mine during the early 1980s was one such woman, having serious fertility issues. Her brother had also been diagnosed with testicular cancer (DES’ effects on men and boys is not discussed as often as those on women and girls).
The jury is out, but it appears that these genetic changes caused by DES haven’t stopped at the first generation but may be continuing to affect the grandchildren of women who took the drug. Nobody knows how far down the line these effects will continue.
Fast forward to the twenty-first century - pregnancy vaccines
The list of things pregnant women were not supposed to do or get is as long as your arm.
In my family, there is a picture of my mother who was 9-months pregnant with me at the time, doing a swan dive into a pool, bent neatly in half. Her parents and cousins were scandalised! How could she take such a risk with her unborn baby? It might explain a lot about me, as a matter of fact! 😜
So many things - foods, toxins, drugs etc are supposed to be avoided during pregnancy when the mother and foetus share so much - and also during the breastfeeding period when anything the mother takes into her body will be passed along to her baby.
So in the early 2000s when the adult DPaT vaccine, Boosterix, started to be offered to pregnant women, it was a bit of a shock since it had never been tested for safety in pregnancy, nor had it been tested for its carcinogenic (cancer-causing) or genotoxic risks.
In the prescribing information for Boosterix, it states clearly that:
Effects on fertility
No human data are available. (emphasis added) In combined fertility and embryofetal development studies in rats and rabbits, female fertility was unaffected by IM administration of BOOSTRIX twice before mating with 2/5x (rats) or 1x (rabbits) the human dose.
Use in lactation
The safety of BOOSTRIX when administered to breast-feeding women has not been evaluated. It is unknown whether BOOSTRIX is excreted in human breast milk. BOOSTRIX should only be used during breast-feeding when the possible advantages outweigh the potential risks.
Genotoxicity
BOOSTRIX has not been evaluated for genotoxicity.
Carcinogenicity
BOOSTRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenicity.
So despite all of these issues and unknowns, every pregnant woman in Australia is encouraged to take this vaccine, and the flu jab during their pregnancy. And now, added to this untested and - by all the available evidence - unsafe and ineffective witch’s brew, is the experimental gene-modifying COVID-19 jab.
We took a while getting here, but the history is important
Women have always gotten the short end of the stick (no pun intended) in medicine. The wonderful paediatrician, Dr Robert Mendelsohn, wrote an entire book about this situation. Entitled, Malepractice: How Doctors Manipulate Women, it discusses how women are used as guinea pigs and treated for hysteria or some other psychosomatic condition despite sharing the same symptoms for which men would receive true medical care.
And pregnant women have been, it appears, the most mistreated, abused of the lot when it comes to Western medicine.
COVID jabs are no different - except that they are.
Despite the fact that no vaccines have ever had to undergo rigorous long-term placebo-controlled randomised trials for safety or efficacy, at least they were not rushed through and foisted upon the pregnant population after only months of supposed trials. Remember that as of today, not one of the COVID vaccines we use in Australia has been approved or licensed. They are all experimental and just provisionally-approved.
The table above shows a 25% increase in pregnancy terminations in Scotland since the introduction of COVID jabs. But like so many graphs provided without context, it only paints part of the picture.
The official explanation is that most of these terminations took place before or around 10 weeks’ gestation. So this is simply women during a pandemic who fell pregnant and decided they didn’t want the baby. The fact that 25% more of them made this choice is not explained. It’s just one of those things…
But as Jikkyleaks and others rightly state, due to the use of pregnancy ultrasounds, congenital malformations can be and are caught very early. And jabbed women who have gotten the news that their babies have devastating issues are much more likely to opt for termination now that they have this information.
We saw the same phenomenon after the introduction of rubella vaccines. Rubella virus, we are told, can cause a condition called Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) which in rare cases can cause congenital issues if the mother contracts it during the first trimester of pregnancy. This has never been proven, but like so much of what doctors say, we’re supposed to take it at face value. It’s the ‘science’!
When the rubella vaccine was first released, within a short period of time, victory was declared. There was supposedly a fall in cases of CRS. What wasn’t discussed, however, was the fact that all women who contracted rubella in the first trimester were advised to terminate their pregnancy, leading to a huge decline in babies born with CRS - even though only a small fraction of those babies ran the risk of any problems whatsoever.
The increase in pregnancy issues after COVID jabs
The issue with Scotland’s interpretation of their termination data is covered very thoroughly in the excellent Substack by Arkmedic, published a few days ago entitled, A miscarriage of statistics: The thalidomide sequel
In the Substack, Arkmedic covers the fact that true miscarriage rates have been artificially inflated for years in order to camouflage the effects of medical procedures and other toxic exposures on fertility and birth rates - both of which have plummeted over the last 2 years. Researchers massaged the figures on miscarriage so hard, they broke them into a million pieces, allowing the mathemagicians to more than double the true figure.
Red flags everywhere!
Arkmedic discusses the parallels between Thalidomide and COVID jabs often in this article. The comparison is very apt indeed!
I realise that I keep returning to the thalidomide scandal but one important lesson that we should have learnt from it was that any increase in miscarriage rate is a massive red flag for severe congenital anomalies.
Due to the overestimation of miscarriage rates in the community, doctors have been able to make it appear that the upsurge in miscarriages is just more of the same old same old.
Nothing could be further from the truth, however. It appears that the real risk of a woman miscarrying their child is and always has been under 6%.
Use of Thalidomide caused a 3% increase in the rate of miscarriage over the 5 years or so it was used - absolutely catastrophic!
COVID jabs however are estimated to be causing twice that - a 6% increase in miscarriage. And the attempts to call anyone stating these facts a conspiracy theorist is the same tactic used against Dr McBride way back when.
This was known about prior to release of the Pfizer jab
You probably already know this, but due to the successful FOI request in the US, Pfizer was forced to release over 80,000 pages of information the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had wanted to hide for 75 years! In this release, it was revealed that there were an extraordinarily high number of pregnancy losses among those women who fell pregnant while they were taking the experimental jab.
Women were specifically advised not to fall pregnant (you would think that, with Pfizer wanting to claim the jab was safe in pregnancy, they would have specifically studied this cohort…) but 270 of those in the trial ended up getting pregnant. Whoops!
Of those 270 women, 238 were lost to follow-up. Once again, whoops! You would think that being involved in the world’s largest clinical trial, more care would have been taken to make sure that all those involved in the trial were followed carefully. But that would assume that those running the trial actually WANTED results instead of whitewash.
Of the 34 women whose pregnancies were actually discussed, 28 of them reported that their babies died - either before or at birth. A fatality rate of 87%! And of the 6 remaining women, 5 had an unknown outcome (marked as pending) with only 1 birth stated to be normal. Not exactly a resounding recommendation for the safety of this experiment in all pregnant women! But governments around the world, including the Australian Government, made that claim and recommended that all pregnant women take the jab.
And despite not having much information on the eventual outcomes for the rest of these pregnancies, there are clues that all might not have gone according to plan (or perhaps it did - it just depends on what the plan actually was…)
124 of these mothers reported reactions - 49 ‘non-serious’ and 75 serious.
So when scientists, doctors, researchers and people like myself cast doubt upon the safety, utility or efficacy of these procedures during pregnancy, it is obvious that we have very good reasons for doing so.
Conversely, when the mainstream medicos, pharmaceutical companies and government talking heads pooh-pooh this information without ever having done the necessary studies first, one has to assume that they also have their reasons. Sadly, the only conclusion that I can arrive at for why this might be is that those reasons are nefarious.
What do you think? If you got this far in the article, congratulations and please feel free to share this post using the link below.
I wish every man and women would read this in full.
Wake Up
Yet many private companies and government departments continue to require employees to be vaccinated. Hoping to see cases for unfair dismissal soon