If COVID was a respiratory illness - and we've been told it is - how do these statistics make any sense?
We know that excess deaths were down substantially in most countries before the jab was introduced, but if deaths from respiratory illnesses were down overall, what did the jab do?
Hat tip to JacquiDeevoy1 on Twitter for sharing this graph from England. It shows deaths from respiratory diseases from 2014-2023.
As you can see, the incidence of death from these conditions was FAR higher prior to the COVID ‘pandemic’. So was there any evidence of a pandemic? And if not, why the emergency declarations, draconian restrictions in every area of our lives and destruction of businesses and society ever introduced?
Every single Chief Health Officer, Health Minister and anyone else who was involved in bringing in these policies without the least bit of evidence that they were necessary or effective should be thrown in prison to await trial for crimes against humanity.
And every person who complied with these destructive rules last time around should be shown this data. They need to understand that without their agreement, none of this could have happened. Next time - and there WILL be a next time - they need to simply say NO and move on. If enough of us do that, the tyrants will be powerless
.
I wonder if they had a separate chart with 'covid' deaths on them, but didn't include them with the 'respiratory' numbers?
But I'm pretty sure in Oz, 'covid' deaths (aka fatal cardiac problems, murder by hospital, whatever you want to insert here...) were included under 'respiratory' as a subset.
So yes, very odd indeed with that UK graph..
Hi Meryl. Thanks for the article. It's distressing to see humans played again and again over so many issues. One being the vaccine con. Just wondering whether you've seen all the information that Craig Paardekooper has presented about vaccines and autism using the VAERS database. How Bad is my batch. The MMR is statistically significant.