Julie Inman Grant is Australia’s eSafety Commissioner. In other words, she is the one who tells people what they can and cannot publish online. And you thought we had freedom of political speech in Australia as guaranteed by High Court Decisions! Think again. This unelected bureaucrat thinks she trumps the law in this country.
She is purported to be concerned about online revenge porn and violence, but it is obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together (eg anyone who isn’t on the Front Bench or in the Shadow Ministry), that her real role is to totally control the internet so we can no longer communicate freely there.
Herr Schwab’s Wet Dream
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which Julie dearest is associated closely with, has long wanted to censor any speech - whether online or in person - that contradicts their goals of a one-world government - they will own everything and you will be happy - OR ELSE! They named Julie one of the most influential world leaders revolutionising government. Oh joy.
On her bio page, it states that Julie has worked closely with Microsoft, Meta and Twitter (pre-Elon Musk) and has a particular interest in gender issues. Why am I not surprised?
And speaking of Twitter, where you can now speak pretty freely about any issue as long as you’re not threatening harm to others, Julie has issued threats to Elon Musk and the new Twitter management because she wants to know how they are tackling “online hate”.
Funny about that, because she has been the eSafety Commissioner for nearly 5 years now and in all that time, I haven’t heard a peep out of her about the hatred, threats of violence and abuse on Twitter (pre-Elon) being hurled at those who questioned the experimental COVID bioweapon.
I also never heard her complain about all of the Australian paedophilia being openly shared on Twitter - that is a form of online hate in my book.
Instead, she uses the powers of the Online Safety Act 2021 (which will soon make what I am doing on this page illegal) to attempt to throttle anyone who isn’t spouting the public line.
There is a public plan that explains what the aims and goals of this Orwellian group are between 2022 and 2025. You can download it below
So what hate is she actually referring to?
I believe Julie wants Twitter to once again target those of us in the Freedom community who share information that threatens the rich, powerful and elites. She states that:
eSafety received more complaints about online hate on Twitter in the past 12 months than any other platform. In fact, close to a third of all complaints to eSafety about online hate occurred on Twitter.
I am concerned that this may be linked to Twitter’s “general amnesty,” offered last November to around 62,000 permanently banned account holders. To be permanently banned from Twitter means repeated and egregious violations of the Twitter Rules. Seventy-five of these reinstated abusive account holders reportedly have over 1 million followers, meaning a small few may be potentially contributing to an outsized impact on the platform’s toxicity.
Well Julie, darling, I hate to break it to you but my account was one of those 62,000 permanently banned. And I was banned for sharing referenced information about medical malfeasance and the holocaust being visited on the world’s people by pHarma, the medical community and the WEF.
In fact, many others I know of who were likewise banned were not committing acts of hate but were in fact, committing acts of caring and education - both of which were. no-go areas before. Apparently, you want this to be the case again today.
So sad, too bad. Because even if you manage to ban Twitter from Australia (taking a page out of the book of Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un etc - you’re in good company!), there will be ways around that by using a VPN etc. The dark web can also become more popular and that is completely outside of your control!
Sadly Julie, your threats are empty and just reveal who you really are. In my mind - it isn’t a pretty picture.
Share this post