More evidence emerges: Canadian Pfizer and Moderna COVID jabs are up to 500X more contaminated than 'allowed' by regulators

The same can be said for these jabs in every country, including Australia

This is not just an article for your information - it is an action alert as well. On this page are some simple steps you can take to let the Attorney General and your Federal Member/State Senators know that you are watching them and will be holding them to account for their inaction on this vital issue.

Thank you to Julian Gillespie for his invaluable help in preparing this article and providing a plethora of background information.

Thank you also to the authors for having the courage to persist in their inquiries. The full text of the preprint article is downloadable here or by clicking the image below. I suggest that even if you don’t have time to read the article now, you download and save it as these things have a way of being ‘disappeared’.

I will just reproduce the Conclusion of this study here for you.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing.

The authors found that by the fraudulent use of the qPCR test (in much the same way as that and other PCR tests were fraudulently used to ‘prove’ the pandemic) rather than a readily available and far more accurate fluorometry test, Pfizer and Moderna tried to claim their jabs were not contaminated with DNA. Use fraudulent tests, get fraudulent (but desired) results.

The authors of this article further examined reports to the American VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) for the lots in which DNA contamination had been found. They discovered a correlation between higher amounts of DNA contamination in certain batches and a higher risk of serious harm from those batches.

To assist readers with all this science, two of the main authors of the article/preprint have simplified their findings in Substack articles - David Spreicher PhD HERE, and especially the easy-to-follow walkthrough by Kevin McKernan HERE.

What are the issues with GMO DNA in products?

The inclusion of genetically modified (GMO) DNA in products is by law required to be approved by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR). An application must be submitted and approval sought prior to the release of foods or therapeutic products containing these ingredients. See this page detailing the current GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna in the Federal Court.

Not only is the synthetic DNA contamination a GMO under Australian law when encapsulated in LNPs, as LNP-modDNA complexes, but the same is also true of the main ingredient modRNA when similarly encapsulated in LNPs, as LNP-modRNA complexes. So a GMO application was also needed to look at the main modRNA ingredient and ask whether it posed a threat to the human genome and human health. As we see in a peer-reviewed paper by Julian Gillespie (linked below), it does most certainly threaten to integrate with natural human DNA, if it hasn't already integrated into millions of people: see The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine.

Gillespie (working with Katie Ashby-Koppens and Peter Fam) also confirmed there are similar legal requirements in many other countries including South Africa, the UK, the European Union, and the United States. The GMO laws in those countries were flouted and ignored, with billions of citizens kept in the dark and unknowingly injected with contaminated products.

These protections were put in place because synthetic GMO DNA can have devastating effects on not only those who ingest or inject them but also on future generations because once this genetic material is incorporated into our native DNA via the process of integration, it is permanent and can cause a range of effects - many of them negative -  many involving innumerable genetic disorders, diseases and cancers.

Combining genetically modified RNA and DNA in the body with Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) that are designed to protect their genetically modified cargoes and prevent them from being discovered or destroyed by our immune system is a recognised and highly effective method of delivering genetically modified materials to the nucleus of cells, in order to alter natural chromosomal DNA.

There was never anything 'new' or 'novel' about these non-vaccines, with research in this area spanning over three decades.

If readers want to see more scientific literature on the targeting of natural DNA with these technologies, scroll down to the Letters of Demand sent to the TGA, OGTR, Pfizer, and Moderna seen on this page, and look at Schedule 1 in any one of those letters (they are almost identical), where many scientific papers are listed. In addition, you will find a very recent science paper HERE which perfectly addresses the true aims behind these LNP/modRNA tech platforms. They were designed long ago to specifically target natural DNA.

Is the Government complicit, once again, in crimes against Australians?

The Covid Medical News Substack has compiled a page with a great deal of this information regarding these GMO injectables. Of particular interest is how Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offences in Australia for not having first applied for and been granted GMO licences. It is doubtful licenses would have ever been granted had data on the excessive amount of DNA contamination and the question of the modRNA integrating into human genes been made public from the beginning.

Gillespie, Ashby-Koppens and Fam have separately prepared a criminal brief of evidence and presented it to the Australian Federal Police. I suggest you bookmark it as it will be regularly updated.

SPECIAL EDITION: Are Covid Vaccines GMO's? And are they Contaminated with Foreign DNA? -- 10th October 2023

By law, Pfizer and Moderna HAD to have had an application approved by OGTR prior to releasing their jabs in Australia. Even an emergency declaration by the Government would not have allowed them to abrogate that responsibility.

As noted above, not having that approval in Australia is a serious criminal offence. This is why Senator Gerard Rennick brought this crime to the attention of the Commonwealth Attorney-General, the Hon Mark Dreyfus, KC MP. 

It is my understanding that Minister Dreyfus and the Australian Federal Police (who are answerable to him) are trying to avoid taking action on this crime. Minister Dreyfus needs to be made aware that he will be judged by his actions (or lack of action) and held accountable for the thousands of Australians killed and the tens or hundreds of thousands injured under his watch.

Lying to Parliament?

In a recent Parliamentary inquiry, the person responsible for policing and safeguarding Australians from GMOs, Dr Raj Bhula of the OGTR, stated that these jabs did not contain GMOs because their creation did not involve a step in genetic modification. How the good doctor could say they do not involve a step in genetic modification is beyond belief since the TGA documents approving Pfizer and Moderna specifically recognise they contain 'modified nucleosides'. Further, both Pfizer and Moderna openly admit their products are genetically modified in their US SEC filings.

You can view her preposterous answers to Senator Rennick’s questions during a Parliamentary Inquiry below. Next week Dr Bhula will again be before a Senate hearing where I understand some Senators want a Hanson-esque 'Please Explain' prepared to expose this misinformation.

You can also read further details in paragraph 43 and 46 of the Brief of Information and Evidence filed with the Australian Federal Police by Solicitor Katie Ashby-Koppens of PJ Brian and Associates at this link.

Whatever you do, I highly recommend you read this document - it is highly readable and important in order for us to understand the severity of these crimes against the Australian population.

What you can do about it

You are not a victim nor are you helpless. Most parliamentarians are woefully ignorant of what is being done in their name and even if they are aware, they often lack the courage to do anything about it.

There is nothing like the knowledge that people in their electorate are holding them accountable (and will vote accordingly) to give them the cojones (look it up) to finally take action and start saving the lives of Australians. The same goes for the Minister.

What I would like to ask you to do is to share this Substack article (using the Share link below or by right clicking on that link to copy the URL for this page if your representative doesn’t list their email contact details) with all of its links with Minister Dreyfus and your Federal Member of Parliament and the Senators for your State. You can find the list of Members and Senators at this link.

Minister Dreyfus can be reached via his contact form at this page and/or you can write to him at:

Hon Mark Dreyfus KC, MP
Attorney General
PO Box 6022
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600

10 people = 2,000 people

In the strange mathematics of politics, if a representative receives correspondence from 10 people about a particular subject, that equates to 2,000 in the community having knowledge of and being concerned about that issue.

You can make a difference - all of you can! All it takes is 10 of you to forward this with a brief cover note. 100 of you doing that would represent 200,000 Australian voices. Kind of hard to ignore, wouldn’t you say?

The government, the media and the pharmaceutical industry want us to be helpless and hopeless. They want us to think that their ‘solutions’ are the only ones available to us for every problem we face.

But you and I know this is not the truth.

We must let them know we see through their lies while we still can do so - before their mis and dis-information legislation is allowed to go any further and before one more child is injured or killed by these jabs.

Accountability is coming.