The Attack On Pregnant Mothers Escalates, by Suzanne Humphries, MD | International Medical Council on Vaccination
As mothers, we are told to be careful about what we eat, what cleaning products we use and what drugs or supplements we take during pregnancy. That's because our babies are so vulnerable to things that we do whilst they are in our wombs.
Yet this so-called study, which doesn't even use a true placebo (testing one vaccine for safety during pregnancy by using as a control, another vaccine which likewise has never been tested for safety during pregnancy is much closer to madness then it is to science) and was paid for by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as by money from vaccine manufacturers, claims to have found that on one factor only - the weight of the babies at birth - those whose mothers got flu shots during the third trimester were heavier than those whose mothers got pneumococcal shots. There was no unvaccinated cohort and no other outcomes were observed.
Were these children followed for the first 6 months of life to see if they achieved milestones in regards to growth, feeding, reflexes and other standards by which we judge a baby to be healthy? Were they observed into their second year of life to find out whether the mercury in the flu shot had increased their risk of developing autism or other neurological problems? Why were the three babies who were stillborn in the flu vaccine cohort ignored and why were so many babies withdrawn from the study without explanation?
Parents want real answers. We want true scientific studies to be done on fully unvaccinated babies and children as compared to their fully vaccinated peers. Papers such as the one discussed in this article are completely worthless except as a cautionary example of what NOT to do when testing drugs or vaccines for safety.