There are no benefits-ONLY risks
7 year old boy dies after COVID jab from heart attack and seizure
This should be headline news on every single newsletter, radio and television station as well as on all social media, but all I’m hearing is…crickets.
There was very little information here. Important questions remain unanswered. For example:
How long after receiving the jab did this death occur?
Was this the child’s first or second jab?
Did he have any known risk factors?
If it was his second jab, did he react to the first?
I can’t even imagine what this child’s family must be going through now! No doubt there are many who would doubt that the jab had anything to do with his death but someone thought this was likely enough that it got reported to the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). Go and check it out - you can search it for yourself and it is instructive to search on one day (see below) to see just how many reports there are - usually hundreds!
This passive reporting system is thought to have an underreporting factor (URF) of at least 31 times. So in the table below which represents all COVID jab reactions reported on the 11th of March this year, there were 146 reactions including 1 death (the one noted above).
If we go for the very conservative URF of 31, that means that there could have been as many as 4,526 reactions that one day!
How much longer is this going to continue? Especially when it comes to children and young adults (up to the age of 30) for whom the risk of a COVID infection is virtually non-existent without some pretty severe underlying illnesses but who are dying and being seriously injured in numbers never seen before.
If you know of a parent who is considering getting this jab for their child or a young adult who is thinking of taking it, please share this with them. I will have much more information on the risks in these age groups as time goes on.
I am banned on Facebook for another 5 days, can't comment or like for another day. Can you comment on the article I posted and what the fact-checkers said.
I want a review and not sure what to say. My first thought was that the FCs say any substantial data is biased so no credibility is given but what they cite according to them isn't biased. It may not be worth the effort. TIA.
Original post I shared: "The UK government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated. The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Covid variants - or possibly any other virus. So let's watch the "real" pandemic begin now! In its Week 42 "COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report", the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that "N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination". It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones). The British now find that the vaccine interferes with the body's ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus. In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once. Source:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf The first insurance companies are backing down because a huge wave of claims is coming their way. Anthony Fauci confirms that the PCR test cannot detect live viruses. Anthony Fauci confirms that neither the antigen test nor the PCR test can tell us whether someone is contagious or not!!! This invalidates all the foundations of the so-called pandemic. The PCR test was the only indication of a pandemic. Without PCR-TEST no pandemic For all the press workers, doctors, lawyers, prosecutors etc. THIS is the final key, the ultimate proof that the measures must all be lifted immediately must be PLEASE SHARE" Please copy and paste this in as many comments as you can do not try and post this on your main Facebook page as it will be taken down by Facebook let’s spread the word!"
Fact-checkers' replies: https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2022/01/fact-check-uk-admits-covid-vaccine-damages-natural-immune-system-national-daily-newspaper.html?fbclid=IwAR1VojVoWsseHLKxWKbrzQpMMv6Tw3StWxdOYR-DB2nf__bj-IafsTDmL1o
And: https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/article-by-the-expose-failed-to-account-for-caveats-listed-in-u-k-vaccine-surveillance-reports-falsely-claims-fully-vaccinated-people-have-weakened-immunity/?fbclid=IwAR1ZHjgM797gIH0nLeeK1jQymD5sTrR8_U2qcLcOLBrdqwhStIVWwcbNWjU
Thanks