An important clarification on the judgement of the 9th circuit court.
From the amazing Viva Frei. Please watch this - what I said yesterday isn't technically correct.
Here is a link to my post from yesterday:
You can subscribe to Informed Choice using your credit card at the link above. If you would prefer to pay by internet banking or to leave a donation for my work, the details are below. If you pay for a subscription in this way, please send an email to admin at myinformedchoice dot com dot au so I can add your details to the list. Thanks so much!
Westpac Bank
Account name - M Dorey
BSB 732591
Account number 613872
Smallpox was a disease which has since been weaponized by both Russia and America Covid was never a disease like that and the June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”
When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?”
But here is a problem - future vaccines are now as per ”June 7, 2024: The 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals just ruled are "forced medical treatment" and the CDC’s claim that the vaccines are ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical question, “safe and effective for what?” which makes all "vaccines" illegal, by definition and purpose.
Now a forced medical treatment which BionTech/Pfizer said should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015) and which targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023) - but what for, one interpretation might be - a chemical "eventual death sentence", like a bullet from a gun instead, as seems to be the case?