16 Comments

Perhaps this should be more than a 'peeve'... the 1900 Constitution has specific clauses I believe that 'alteration' or other activity against the Constitution may provoke severe penalties. This can only occur of course if the people demand and enforce it.

Legislators I understand must use the Macquarie Law dictionary which I have been told we can access on-line via the State libraries.

Expand full comment

Before the covid scam started,there was a video which I found and posted it on Facebook. A video of Bill Gates on stage addressing the CIA on vaccines that "we" have developed. In his presentation he openly bragged what these vaccines could do.such as even change the thoughts of terrorists.in his words "we can do just about anything with these vaccines " not long after the covid scam started,I looked everywhere on the Internet to find this video again.it has been completely erased .I found a message somewhere, but can't remember where..it said people have tried looking for a Bill Gates video of the CIA and vaccines ( this video never existed) or words to that effect. We all know now about censorship since this all started.At least the covid scam has woken millions of people up around the world.

Expand full comment

Most people my age (boomers and such) truly have it ingrained in their heads that we are doomed because there are too many of us....yet they think THEY should live. Most of them took the jabs.

Neil Oliver is wonderful...and I know why he concentrated on babies...but the truth is, what he said...those in power and those that control the world, are those that can do what we cannot (becuase they are psychopaths).....and they have done what we cannot...because they too beleive there were too many people in the world...so they found a way to correct it....babies/births are down in every Western democracy between 15 and such percent...while excess deaths are around 20 percent STILL.

So now, my peers, you will get your wish.

In trying to save one more day my peer group, you volunteeered to go first. Deal with it.

Expand full comment

Stupidity and ignorance are common human attributes. Add arrogance and we have your WEF et al plus every other authoritarian, totalitarian lunatic with delusions of grandeur.

No need for conspiracy theories to explain that. These types have been around since Homo Sapiens first appeared in Africa.

Expand full comment

Isn't it time we broke the cycle, and educated everyone about human nature?

Expand full comment

A nice sentiment. But education just doesn't cut it in the real world of human nature.

Just in the field of the Australian government apparatus (federal and state) some of the most educated are the most obnoxious. And the private sector is probably worse.

Aristotle is supposed to have said " Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man ". Your education is going to have to start from the cradle. Huxley's " Brave New World " perhaps ?

Expand full comment

Well, I think I agree...education has obviously been just an indoctrination of us all to beleive in what we are told by Govt, teachers, and tv.

Pity that.

I rememer yelling at my parents for not tel,iing me about how the world really worked.

Poor things...but of course, the world changed from their days...

Expand full comment
Oct 22, 2023Liked by Meryl Dorey

We are under a Corporate management purporting to be government, ANd it is subject to Commercial law under Law Merchant (see 'Bills of Exchange Act 1909, para 5 sub-para 2) which means you and I can Contract anyone including those claiming any authority under these commercial structures. We do not have at present ANY Constitutional government entities as required from January 1901 which was specifically expressed by the people in 1900. Go check for yourself.

Expand full comment
author

I've read and heard much about this.

What I need to know is - what do we do about it?

The government and their bureaucrats are behaving as if they are a law unto themselves. And those who are meant to enforce our laws are their protection racket.

Expand full comment

precisely. They are a law unto themselves because they made the laws that enable them to do just that. The major point is that it is all Commerce and we too can apply the laws of commerce and make contract in commerce. The one form of Contract that no other can interfere in with impunity is a contract between two living flesh and blood individuals. We are being 'offered' a contract in all manner of cases though do not recognize them as such and so by inaction, or non-reply, we give our Tacit consent. We can though conditionally accept in a Counter Offer that becomes a new Contract to which we include our conditions of acceptance and set that with a time limit to respond which if ignored, ie no response within say 14 days, closes the contract by Tacit Consent. Two can play this game.

Expand full comment

Yes, can you please inform us of how under bills of exchange law, we can tell the Who that they don't need a country...we are sovereign individuals and we reject their power grab?

Expand full comment

i think you just did. The Constitution agreed by the people in 1900, given the monarch's consent by proclamation and the Great Seal, published in January 1901 states clearly that the people of Australia will treat as Treason any action furthering the interests of any foreigner that is against the Australian people's interests or well being. Its only 22 pages so it should be easy to find the exact wording. Be wary of those who have tried to change the effect of the Constitution by changing the supposed definitions or meanings or words as written. And there appears to have been repeated attempts to remove or rewrite the Preamble which IS an integral part of the Constitution. I believe this activcity may be covered by the word Treachery .

Expand full comment

That is one of my pet peeves...people trying to acribe modern meanings to the Constitution, rather than their meaning at the time. Drives me crazy.

I keep an old Websters for just that purpose...of course, it is from the 1800's and the printing is fading...but with a magnifying glass...

Expand full comment

One page from a 500 page study of political corruption and deception in Australia. Suggest you read and think about what it illustrates.

The unconstitutional “laws of Australia”,

Privy Council (Appeals from the High Court) Act 1975, No.33 of 30th April 1975, made by Members of Political Parties, each under their own Party’s Constitution,

sitting inside their own “Australia” or “the Commonwealth”, with their “Australian Government Gazette”, “Government Printer of Australia”, “Land for Australia”, “Australian Citizens” making Oaths/Affirmations of Allegiance to a “Queen of Australia”, and with their own private “Governor-General of Australia” using a “Great Seal of Australia”;

“to limit further the matters in which Special Leave of Appeal

from the High Court of Australia to Her Majesty in Council may be asked”;

with the unconstitutional enacting manner and form of:-

“BE IT ENACTED by

the Queen, the Senate and the House of Representatives of Australia”

Refer: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/pcfthca1975417/

and with the unconstitutional enacting manner and form of:- “The Parliament of Australia enacts”

Refer: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A00255

where it is also shown with , the same seal

as on the Australian Citizenship Act 1973, No. 99 of 17th September 1973; as is watermarked on current “Australian Dollar” polymer (plastic) notes; and as registered as “Stylised Arms No. 2 (Solid) US Serial No. 89000533” in 1992 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO);

and the Australia Acts 1986, commencing 3rd March 1986, with its

Provision 11—Termination of appeals to Her Majesty in Council, under which

“no appeal to Her Majesty in Council lies or shall be brought, whether by leave or special leave

of any court or of Her Majesty in Council or otherwise, and whether by virtue

of any Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom,

the Royal Prerogative or otherwise,

from or in respect of any decision of an Australian court”;

as confirmed by the “High Court of Australia” in:-

Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [1996] HCA 24

(12 September 1996); 189 CLR 51

Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, McHugh and Gummow JJ.,

created for Members of Political Parties, each under their own Party’s Constitution and policies, for their Australian Parliaments, Governments and Courts, their own “High Court of Australia” to be the “ultimate appellate court of the nation”, with the duty of supervising the nation’s legal system and of maintaining a unified system of common law in/of “Australia” (being NOT the “common law of England”).

Note: “nation” “of Australia” = “the sovereign, independent and federal nation”

___________________________________________________________________

Corporations made by Members of Political Parties control all sections of Parliaments, Governments and Courts “of Australia” whereas from 1st January 1901, the people “of the Commonwealth of Australia” are to live under a Constitutional Monarchy.

(Page 280 of 442)

Expand full comment

All the problems in the world today such as vaccine mandates, business and border lockdowns, the problems in Gazza, the yes case for the voice referendum, the gay marriage referendum, BLM call to defund Police, children being told they can have a sex change without telling their parents, legalising illegal drugs, climate change, the push to take control of farm land, social media bills being put to Parliament and other things. If you know what to look for you can see whats behind it. The New World Order of the WEF and their affiliates trying to destroy the Western World and Democracy so they can take over and turn it into a High Tech Totalatarian Society.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, their intent is clear. It's up to us to let others know this and hopefully, allow them to see how much risk they and their children are in from these evil forces. It's a real uphill battle...

Expand full comment