6 Comments

The elite decided long ago that there are simply too many unimportant people on earth. We are beneath them. They believe it is their duty, their manifest responsibility, to manage the world population so as to preserve the earth’s resources for themselves, the only “worthy” ones. This concept is not new. They have for generations now openly expressed their desire to shrink the world population by various means. They start wars, engineer shortages, deliberately induce infertility and disease, contaminate the water/air/food, etc -- because it would be a far messier and riskier thing for them to overtly drag the unwashed masses into the streets before firing squads or into gas chambers. They know how outnumbered they are. So they dumb down the citizenry, elicit your trust, pretend to care about your health and safety, promise “solutions,” all while stabbing you in the back (while picking your pocket, I might add). And because millions of people (if not actual billions) of people cooperate/comply, they believe they have your tacit consent. In their view, it’s your fault that you are so easily duped anyway, and by leaving this planet sooner than later, you are performing a service for “The Greater Good.” And saving the planet as a bonus! Although saving the planet for whom or what remains to be seen -- because your descendants are of no greater value to them than you are in the present.

Jesus said, “The thief (Satan) comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” John 10:10

Expand full comment

The scamdemic was merely a write-off of beneficiaries.

What presents as "Government" is merely a private corporation given the duty to administer a bankruptcy of the de jure Commonwealth of Australia.

The people of the de jure Commonwealth of Australia granted Parliament the authority (which the Constitution didn't ) to deal with the Financial Emergencies of the late 1920's and early 1930's in the Referendum of 1928.

The solution Parliament employed was in effect an act of treachery, but since none of the people challenged it in a meaningful way, it must have been ok.

Parliament's solution was to place the assets of the people in trust, and through the mechanism of creating a look-a-like corporate entity, entice the people to abandon the inherent jurisdiction of the Commonwealth where Common Law existed and the people had unalienable rights, so that they occupied a position in the newly formed legal jurisdiction which was inhabited by corporations, corporate soles and other fictions of law.

When a sovereign Government ceases using money of substance and instead begins to use fiat currency, it has in effect surrendered its claim of sovereignty (Queen/King of Australia anyone?)

And when it registers itself as a corporation on a foreign Corporations register, it unambiguously has no rightful claim to any sovereignty.

But it does have dominion over it's creations, including any people who by election, pretend to be one of those creations.

If you rely on a Birth Certificate as a form of id, then that is you.

Know the Birth Certificate for what it is, and know that with the right knowledge and process of law and equity, it's source can be made the kernel of a private trust whereby you control that private corporation !

Expand full comment

We are the forgotten people, the tax payers. It has taken me the last 3 years to realise that as an octogenarian, we do not count, the so-called elected representatives do not work for us but for the big end of town. Very sad.

Expand full comment

If we take a dive into History, there are PLENTY of opportunities for people to become learned about how and why and when the govts of the world have been trying to kill us.

Plenty.

Perhaps most people don't delve much into history. Which is a shame, because if they did, and if we learned from it, we might not have need for that adage 'History repeats itself'!

Expand full comment

Thalidomide varied by country, USA didn't allow it due to a savvy woman medic in charge of the decision who wanted to see the test results first. I don't think it was withdrawn in the UK till about 1972? Now used in cancer treatment with a revised manufacturing procedure that was realised to be 'faulty' first time round 🙏

Expand full comment