Agreed. It was a survival test, requiring both intelligence and common sense, and about 80% of the Western World and almost 70% of the entire world failed by taking 1 or more dangerous shots.
Most have yet to admit the mistake let alone learn from it, and the cycle Is starting again. We might improve to 50% on round 2, but I doubt it.
I feel like we're up to page 59 of the 2017 John Hopkins University's SPARS Pandemic scenario...
They wrote the book to follow along with the 2020 real life movie, renamed Covid 19.
Deliberately written in a "rear view mirror" style, which helps iron out the narrative for the role players on the panel (easier to spot mistakes if you gameplay it as if it already happened)
From SPARS page 63... (Some CAPITALISATIONS are mine for emphasis)
"The senior leaders in attendance concluded, after much prompting by Dr. Flynn, that no top political or public health figurehead had publicly recognized the collective sense of vulnerability that the pandemic had elicited or the strength that the public exhibited under threat of grave danger.
Moreover, no national leader had publicly acknowledged the public's broad willingness to accept a prescribed COUNTERMEASURE that promised to end the pandemic, but whose long-term consequences were NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD AT THE TIME.
Following the meeting, ASPR recommended to HHS Secretary Nagel that SAMHSA collaborate with stakeholders and devise behavioral health guidance for the states, tribes, and territories on how to strengthen the public's coping skills, provide support for grieving individuals, encourage a forward direction, and meet other SPARS recovery needs.
It was further recommended that Secretary Nagel consult with President Archer about the possibility of acknowledging the emotional toll of SPARS during a future public appearance.
The primary message would be one of gratitude to the American people for remaining strong during the pandemic.
Another key message would convey APPRECIATION for ADHERING to public health recommendations, INCLUDING VACCINATION, to hasten the end of the pandemic in the face of considerable uncertainty.
President Archer agreed to address the country's resolve and recovery in the face of SPARS. Top risk communication advisors from the CDC, FDA, NIH, and SAMHSA conferred as a group about HOW best to FRAME the President's remarks.
The group vigorously debated whether it was appropriate for the President to acknowledge the SACRIFICE that VACCINE RECIPIENTS had made on behalf of their communities or to console them in their grief over that sacrifice."
All those that took the poison shots were "HEROES" you see... See that's how easily you smooth over the death and injuries (pre planned extermination?!) ...
SPARS rhymes with SARS ... What a coincidence, and simulates the first ever "coronavirus" Pandemic... Amazing how they game planned it all...
*Edit: I meant to add ... The fact they allowed for vax injuries in this scenario, why was it mandated? They allowed for injuries, as if they were a certainty, therefore mandating three years later, seems negligent? Or is this why they made sure of zero liability, to enact this plan?!
Yeah but AZ isn't GMO theyre just knocking the competition out of the way (commercial reasons) with loose stats to make sure the GMO jab will be t h e only option next time. Just like ivermecton was pushed aside.
Donald Trump's tenure as the 45th president of the United States began with his inauguration on January 20, 2017, and ended on January 20, 2021. Wikipedia - note "2017-2021"
The Defense Production Act has played a role in the U.S. government’s response to COVID-19 (from about November 1st 2019 US virus release date ) pandemic.
President Trump declared a national emergency in March 2020, making the pandemic eligible for government action under the Defense Production Act.
President Trump said he invoked the Defense Production Act more than 100 times to facilitate Operation Warp Speed.
Trump has made the vaccinated all part of a "US Army experiment" and when you re-elect him, he will finish the job on behalf of his masters, whoever they are, but let us presuppose they are those I have identified in the final paragraph and others.
The vaccinated are countermeasure prototypes, for the US Army, to see the objective of a Covid-19 (vaccines) countermeasure, in the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity" by spike protein,the most antigenic and toxic part of a coronavirus" (vaccine) based on the measurable effects of their (the vaccines) deployment", by the US military's own definitions of terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccine) products it commissioned "amount to bioweapons" and the vaccinated are part of the US Army experiment to see the effectiveness of their Covid-19 vaccines weapon, as explained below:
The injection of these "countermeasure prototype vaccines" which satisfy the US military definition of a biological agent into people has killed some recipients and permanently disabled increasingly large numbers of others, "resulting in their (vaccines) operational effectiveness based on the measurable effects of their (vaccines) deployment", by the US military's own definitions of (vaccines) terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccines) products it commissioned "amount to bioweapons".
The US military defines a biological agent as a micro-organism (or toxin derived from it) that causes disease.
Vaccines are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration as biological products, therefore they can be described as biological agents.
The mRNA (ModRNA) products instruct recipients cells to make a form of its spike protein, the most antigenic and, some researchers argue, toxic part of a coronavirus.
Since December 2020, 5.5 billion people, 72 per cent of the global population, have been injected with Covid-19 vaccines commissioned under Operation Warp Speed by the US Army "as countermeasure prototypes", by 2024 at least 8 billion people out of 8.5 billion people have been vaccinated with these bioweapons.
By the US military's own definition, The US Army Covid-19 vaccines bioweapon provides "the objective of a countermeasure which is the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity" by spike protein,the most antigenic and toxic part of a coronavirus,as a weapon,is proven,but for the vaccinated, they are the vaccine experiment then.
Trump followed on by Biden. Excuse me for saying so, but after the world populations have been decimated down to 250 million, more or less by 2025/26, by this US Army bioweapon, who will be left to use it on?
Refer back to the beginning of my above article and read it again, if you missed something, from my "Update 2".
I can't help wondering if the Elite, comprising Putin, Trump, Biden, Xi and other world leaders and the unseen billionaires, the WHO, WEF, etc, are in this together, but playing their parts to make we, the "Human Rubbish" of their societies, think there are warlike political divisions between us, when those divisions are for "your" show, just to fool you, while your extermination continues unregulated.
It is what I've been saying in my substack these past 4 years, I just never had the facts to prove my theories, now I do.
Whoever you are, wherever you work, vaccinate the Elite in your sphere of influence and make your vaccinated problems theirs too but leave their Human Rubbish, who we are, alone.
The full version is in my post before this one on my free substack - read it through and confirm if my assumptions are correct, to your satisfaction
Please learn paragrah usage. Best to stay on one topic and not go all over the place even when displaying knowledge.
I know ALL the boutique doctors. What is interesting and timely is that there are now thousands of renegade MD's. Still they represent less that 1% of the total.
The Medical Cartel, ( it is and has been a cartel) is self destructing, and that is mostly a good thing. Basic writing skills are necessary for clear consise communication.
Christine is NOT vaccinated, so from her perspective, it is wait and see for you who are. The Law is the Law, the Legislation for what is happening now was put in place in 2013, it seems very unlikely that the deaths by Turbo Cancer and other things are a figment of my imagination - but I hope you are right, 100% I hope you are right and I am 100% Wrong - nothing would please me more.
Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al. may own your genes once you’re injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA
WASHINGTON, D.C. — This article is prefaced with a shout-out to the good Dr. Carrie Madej (maa-DAY).
She is one of thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide suddenly labeled “conspiracy theorists” and “disinformation” by mainstream and social media. Dr. Madej tells peer-reviewed truth about COVID-19 and experimental shots. She is still on Twitter and Facebook for now. Dr. Madej is also featured in a viral video warning people about experiment mRNA and viral vector shots.
She said in a recent interview with The New American:
“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates, The Department of Defense, [and others] can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”
Dr. Madej told The COVID Blog via email that she learned about gene patenting from Dr. Craig Venter. He spoke about it during a world symposium presentation. All legitimate doctors and scientists welcome fact-checking and peer-review. Turns out Dr. Madej is onto something, and further affirms every reason not to volunteer for these experimental injections.
Man-made bacteria and genetically-modified mice are patentable
The case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) is the first time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a patent case involving naturally-occurring processes and/or organisms. Dr. Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty invented a species of oil-eating bacteria while working at General Electric in 1971. His invention streamlined the process of cleaning up oil spills.
He filed a first-of-its-kind patent for the new genetically-modified bacteria species. The United Kingdom had already granted the patent. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the patent because it determined the invention was a living organism. The U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (now the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) reversed the decision. It ruled that just because micro-organisms are alive doesn’t mean they cannot be patented.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, affirmed. It ruled, in part:
Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a “manufacture” or “composition of matter” within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability.
The case paved the way for biotechnology companies and universities. The OncoMouse, patented by Harvard in 1988, was the first mammal ever patented. Harvard scientists genetically-modified mice to be predisposed to cancer (thus the “onco” prefix) so other scientists could study the disease.
Scientists have since created an entire discipline on “transgenic non-human mammals.” Of course there are serious ethical concerns. But the practice continue.
Patentability of human genes (mRNA and DNA)
The case that provides the blueprint for pharmaceutical companies claiming ownership of your genes is Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). This case originated from a Utah-based company called Myriad Genetics.
The company isolated the location and sequence of naturally-occurring genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutations in these genes positively correlate with predispositions to breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad filed patents on these genes in 1994 and 1995, respectively. The patents gave Myriad exclusive rights to cancer genetic testing that isolated natural DNA strands and created synthetic complementary DNA (cDNA) that resembled the original isolated strands.
The USPTO granted both patents in 1998. At least 2,000 other human genes had been patented through 2010, according to the New York State Bar. But the Myriad patents hindered other scientists from doing research on naturally-occurring BRCA1 and BRCA2, and thus hindered breast and ovarian cancer testing by other companies.
Supreme Court permits patentable cDNA
Several Plaintiffs, including Yale, Columbia, individual patients, and patient advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against Myriad and the University of Utah in May of 2009. The Plaintiffs argued that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they are naturally-occurring. Myriad argued that it isolated the sequences of the DNA and that the Patent Office had issued patents for other companies doing the same thing.
A long legal battle ensued that included two writs of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Circuit twice affirmed that both isolated DNA and cDNA are patentable. Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that only cDNA (synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable. Breast and ovarian cancer screening got much cheaper after the ruling since Myriad no longer owned patents on naturally-occurring genes and thus the testing.
When it was all said and done, the Supreme Court invalidated five of Myriad’s 520 patent claims. Myriad sued competitors for marketing ovarian and breast cancers tests based on the two natural genes after the Supreme Court decision. Ambry Genetics won a case against Myriad in 2014. The company said via press release:
Myriad did not create or alter any of the genetic information encoded in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The location and order of the nucleotides existed in nature before Myriad found them. As the Supreme Court made clear, neither naturally occurring compositions of matter, nor synthetically created compositions that are structurally identical to the naturally occurring compositions, are patent eligible.
Pfizer, Moderna, et al. and your genes
Yes, this article contains a lot of scientific and legal mumbo-jumbo. But in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally-occurring. No mouse is born in nature like the OncoMouse. It is thus patentable. Oil-eating bacteria come from genetic manipulation, thus patentable.
Notice how all these so-called doctors and scientists avoid pointing fingers at Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson et al. when someone dies within hours, days or weeks of receiving their shots. It’s almost as if said doctors and scientists are carefully navigating the trademark and patent landscape. They don’t want to trespass on someone else’s property, if you will. Moderna owns several mRNA patents. Doctors and hospitals wanting a piece of the mRNA pie cannot bite the hand that feeds them.
The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) the shots change your genetic code and 2) the shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. He says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life” (at the 0:43 second mark, but the whole video is…disturbing).
Viral vectors do the same thing.
So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible. Do the math yourself.
The only hing to fear is fear itself. The entire Globalist program has been to generate fear. Panic because there’s no toilet paper? There was plenty of toilet paper. Kill all our bees because of Verona attacks? There’s always been Verona pests. Bird flu, another plan to kill all our chooks - rubbish bird flu is another generator of fear. Keep your powder dry ‘ till you see the whites of their eyes. The murderous puppeteers drive the timid.
The toxic clowns will likely pull another stunt, probably not far in advance of the USA presidential election.
It is up to the awake (not woke) to tell the clowns where to go. The herd might follow but, then again, maybe not. The herd are more interested in their next Bali pig out, cruise or something.
Based on recent events they ALL have a 'quid pro quo' arrangement with the various governments across the globe.This latest "honest" reporting is just a little tease of what they can/could do, imo. If you want our continued support these are our new terms and conditions, so cough up. Tax breaks anyone? They already know that the "great unwashed" have the attention span of a gnat & personally that's what I'm really afraid of, the mob. The lack of clear thinking, by the majority, is dragging ALL of us into the pen.
Thanks Christine, it's almost suffocating the amount of stupidity we're surrounded by. I would challenge anyone to just sit & watch the people who walk through a shopping centre & think we'll be fine. More pain on its way, I'm afraid. All the best.
Roc. Winston Churchill said that if one wanted to be concerned about democracy, spend 10 mins with the average voter.
My friends and I all unvaxxed are clear thinking and can see huge problems, but others out there? More concerned about the latest idiot reality TV show....
Unfortunately we do have to do “normal” things like shopping. I don’t walk around thinking everything will be fine, quite the opposite-but I doubt anyone could pick up by my face that I know things won’t be fine until something of magnitude changes.
I agree with Jan, and even though Sky News were vocal there was always that “ holding back” element in their reporting. It pays to remember who owns Sky News. So, just enough outrage but never enough punch to endanger the plans of the Globalists.
I notice the blonde in red forgot to mention the role of MSM and how influential they were in destroying lives, blaming, ruficuling, shaming. . She was happy to point the finger at politicians and "society" but omitted to mention how evil the presstitutes were in manipulation and deceit . I wouldnt trust any of those talking heads who think they have the right to turn their personal views into "news" or "current affairs". .
Sky News and Epoch Times are not MSM. The have run stories critical of the vaccines starting in late 2020. They are often disparaged by leftish media outlets for being alt-media or far-right media. Although I think conservative-leaning would be more fair.
I have found several good Sky News pieces on the scamdemic through Substack, but living in the United States I never paid attention to the individual reporters.
Reading Wikipedia on Chris Kenny, I can see why one would suspect that he is controlled opposition. Then I did a search on DuckDucjGo for his reporting on “Excess deaths” and “Adverse Events.” I came up with one good opinion piece that Sweden did better than Australia when 2022 is included without lockdowns. I expected much more.
I will have to look into the other reporters.
Steve Kirsch and Peter McCullough may or may not be controlled opposition, but they have led to me even better sources of information. I personally think they have their political agendas and biases which make them helpful but limited. I prefer both to Robert Malone, especially after his frivolous lawsuits.
stupid comment, try accuracy
My opinion is that Covid was the widest scale intelligence test ever conducted, many failed.
The Gubmits will never stop. Question is are people going to go along with the hogwash again??
The indicators are that most will not. That is why the panic.
Agreed. It was a survival test, requiring both intelligence and common sense, and about 80% of the Western World and almost 70% of the entire world failed by taking 1 or more dangerous shots.
Most have yet to admit the mistake let alone learn from it, and the cycle Is starting again. We might improve to 50% on round 2, but I doubt it.
I feel like we're up to page 59 of the 2017 John Hopkins University's SPARS Pandemic scenario...
They wrote the book to follow along with the 2020 real life movie, renamed Covid 19.
Deliberately written in a "rear view mirror" style, which helps iron out the narrative for the role players on the panel (easier to spot mistakes if you gameplay it as if it already happened)
From SPARS page 63... (Some CAPITALISATIONS are mine for emphasis)
"The senior leaders in attendance concluded, after much prompting by Dr. Flynn, that no top political or public health figurehead had publicly recognized the collective sense of vulnerability that the pandemic had elicited or the strength that the public exhibited under threat of grave danger.
Moreover, no national leader had publicly acknowledged the public's broad willingness to accept a prescribed COUNTERMEASURE that promised to end the pandemic, but whose long-term consequences were NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD AT THE TIME.
Following the meeting, ASPR recommended to HHS Secretary Nagel that SAMHSA collaborate with stakeholders and devise behavioral health guidance for the states, tribes, and territories on how to strengthen the public's coping skills, provide support for grieving individuals, encourage a forward direction, and meet other SPARS recovery needs.
It was further recommended that Secretary Nagel consult with President Archer about the possibility of acknowledging the emotional toll of SPARS during a future public appearance.
The primary message would be one of gratitude to the American people for remaining strong during the pandemic.
Another key message would convey APPRECIATION for ADHERING to public health recommendations, INCLUDING VACCINATION, to hasten the end of the pandemic in the face of considerable uncertainty.
President Archer agreed to address the country's resolve and recovery in the face of SPARS. Top risk communication advisors from the CDC, FDA, NIH, and SAMHSA conferred as a group about HOW best to FRAME the President's remarks.
The group vigorously debated whether it was appropriate for the President to acknowledge the SACRIFICE that VACCINE RECIPIENTS had made on behalf of their communities or to console them in their grief over that sacrifice."
All those that took the poison shots were "HEROES" you see... See that's how easily you smooth over the death and injuries (pre planned extermination?!) ...
Let's see if this is the narrative they follow 🤔
SPARS 2017 scenario can be obtained here 👇
https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
SPARS rhymes with SARS ... What a coincidence, and simulates the first ever "coronavirus" Pandemic... Amazing how they game planned it all...
*Edit: I meant to add ... The fact they allowed for vax injuries in this scenario, why was it mandated? They allowed for injuries, as if they were a certainty, therefore mandating three years later, seems negligent? Or is this why they made sure of zero liability, to enact this plan?!
I don’t regard Sky as MSM, but, they were almost as bad as them during Covid and about vaccine mandates.
Yeah but AZ isn't GMO theyre just knocking the competition out of the way (commercial reasons) with loose stats to make sure the GMO jab will be t h e only option next time. Just like ivermecton was pushed aside.
'Baffling'
🤣🤣🤣
Murdoch….
I’ll personally maintain a very healthy scepticism .
That is ABSOLUTELY ASTONISHING!!! I'm stunned.
I could only watch the first 2 minutes because then Dan came on it was so TRIGGERING!!! My whole body was reacting... in a not good way!
Let's hope there's more and more of this.
Thanks Meryl.
Donald Trump's tenure as the 45th president of the United States began with his inauguration on January 20, 2017, and ended on January 20, 2021. Wikipedia - note "2017-2021"
The Defense Production Act has played a role in the U.S. government’s response to COVID-19 (from about November 1st 2019 US virus release date ) pandemic.
President Trump declared a national emergency in March 2020, making the pandemic eligible for government action under the Defense Production Act.
President Trump said he invoked the Defense Production Act more than 100 times to facilitate Operation Warp Speed.
Trump has made the vaccinated all part of a "US Army experiment" and when you re-elect him, he will finish the job on behalf of his masters, whoever they are, but let us presuppose they are those I have identified in the final paragraph and others.
The vaccinated are countermeasure prototypes, for the US Army, to see the objective of a Covid-19 (vaccines) countermeasure, in the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity" by spike protein,the most antigenic and toxic part of a coronavirus" (vaccine) based on the measurable effects of their (the vaccines) deployment", by the US military's own definitions of terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccine) products it commissioned "amount to bioweapons" and the vaccinated are part of the US Army experiment to see the effectiveness of their Covid-19 vaccines weapon, as explained below:
The injection of these "countermeasure prototype vaccines" which satisfy the US military definition of a biological agent into people has killed some recipients and permanently disabled increasingly large numbers of others, "resulting in their (vaccines) operational effectiveness based on the measurable effects of their (vaccines) deployment", by the US military's own definitions of (vaccines) terms used in Operation Warp Speed contracts, the (vaccines) products it commissioned "amount to bioweapons".
The US military defines a biological agent as a micro-organism (or toxin derived from it) that causes disease.
Vaccines are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration as biological products, therefore they can be described as biological agents.
The mRNA (ModRNA) products instruct recipients cells to make a form of its spike protein, the most antigenic and, some researchers argue, toxic part of a coronavirus.
Since December 2020, 5.5 billion people, 72 per cent of the global population, have been injected with Covid-19 vaccines commissioned under Operation Warp Speed by the US Army "as countermeasure prototypes", by 2024 at least 8 billion people out of 8.5 billion people have been vaccinated with these bioweapons.
By the US military's own definition, The US Army Covid-19 vaccines bioweapon provides "the objective of a countermeasure which is the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity" by spike protein,the most antigenic and toxic part of a coronavirus,as a weapon,is proven,but for the vaccinated, they are the vaccine experiment then.
Trump followed on by Biden. Excuse me for saying so, but after the world populations have been decimated down to 250 million, more or less by 2025/26, by this US Army bioweapon, who will be left to use it on?
Refer back to the beginning of my above article and read it again, if you missed something, from my "Update 2".
I can't help wondering if the Elite, comprising Putin, Trump, Biden, Xi and other world leaders and the unseen billionaires, the WHO, WEF, etc, are in this together, but playing their parts to make we, the "Human Rubbish" of their societies, think there are warlike political divisions between us, when those divisions are for "your" show, just to fool you, while your extermination continues unregulated.
It is what I've been saying in my substack these past 4 years, I just never had the facts to prove my theories, now I do.
Whoever you are, wherever you work, vaccinate the Elite in your sphere of influence and make your vaccinated problems theirs too but leave their Human Rubbish, who we are, alone.
The full version is in my post before this one on my free substack - read it through and confirm if my assumptions are correct, to your satisfaction
Please learn paragrah usage. Best to stay on one topic and not go all over the place even when displaying knowledge.
I know ALL the boutique doctors. What is interesting and timely is that there are now thousands of renegade MD's. Still they represent less that 1% of the total.
The Medical Cartel, ( it is and has been a cartel) is self destructing, and that is mostly a good thing. Basic writing skills are necessary for clear consise communication.
Wow. Truth Seeker could not be more sure of itself. Teach us please!!
Christine is quite talented at inaccurately assessing.
She is very accurate.
She is very accurate. Pay attention and learn.
Lucile, you have no idea to whom you are critiqueing.
Learning these items are for rubes. Some of us teach the class.
Oh please enlighten us
Lucile, tis not an assignment I am interested in
I am however interested in clear concise on point communication
Try harder to say something relevant
Christine is NOT vaccinated, so from her perspective, it is wait and see for you who are. The Law is the Law, the Legislation for what is happening now was put in place in 2013, it seems very unlikely that the deaths by Turbo Cancer and other things are a figment of my imagination - but I hope you are right, 100% I hope you are right and I am 100% Wrong - nothing would please me more.
Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al. may own your genes once you’re injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA
April 27, 2021 admin
TheCOVIDBlog.com
April 27, 2021 (updated January 30, 2022)
WASHINGTON, D.C. — This article is prefaced with a shout-out to the good Dr. Carrie Madej (maa-DAY).
She is one of thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide suddenly labeled “conspiracy theorists” and “disinformation” by mainstream and social media. Dr. Madej tells peer-reviewed truth about COVID-19 and experimental shots. She is still on Twitter and Facebook for now. Dr. Madej is also featured in a viral video warning people about experiment mRNA and viral vector shots.
She said in a recent interview with The New American:
“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates, The Department of Defense, [and others] can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”
Dr. Madej told The COVID Blog via email that she learned about gene patenting from Dr. Craig Venter. He spoke about it during a world symposium presentation. All legitimate doctors and scientists welcome fact-checking and peer-review. Turns out Dr. Madej is onto something, and further affirms every reason not to volunteer for these experimental injections.
Man-made bacteria and genetically-modified mice are patentable
The case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) is the first time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a patent case involving naturally-occurring processes and/or organisms. Dr. Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty invented a species of oil-eating bacteria while working at General Electric in 1971. His invention streamlined the process of cleaning up oil spills.
He filed a first-of-its-kind patent for the new genetically-modified bacteria species. The United Kingdom had already granted the patent. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the patent because it determined the invention was a living organism. The U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (now the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) reversed the decision. It ruled that just because micro-organisms are alive doesn’t mean they cannot be patented.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, affirmed. It ruled, in part:
Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a “manufacture” or “composition of matter” within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability.
The case paved the way for biotechnology companies and universities. The OncoMouse, patented by Harvard in 1988, was the first mammal ever patented. Harvard scientists genetically-modified mice to be predisposed to cancer (thus the “onco” prefix) so other scientists could study the disease.
<span style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" data-mce-type="bookmark" class="mce_SELRES_start">?</span>
Scientists have since created an entire discipline on “transgenic non-human mammals.” Of course there are serious ethical concerns. But the practice continue.
Patentability of human genes (mRNA and DNA)
The case that provides the blueprint for pharmaceutical companies claiming ownership of your genes is Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). This case originated from a Utah-based company called Myriad Genetics.
The company isolated the location and sequence of naturally-occurring genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutations in these genes positively correlate with predispositions to breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad filed patents on these genes in 1994 and 1995, respectively. The patents gave Myriad exclusive rights to cancer genetic testing that isolated natural DNA strands and created synthetic complementary DNA (cDNA) that resembled the original isolated strands.
The USPTO granted both patents in 1998. At least 2,000 other human genes had been patented through 2010, according to the New York State Bar. But the Myriad patents hindered other scientists from doing research on naturally-occurring BRCA1 and BRCA2, and thus hindered breast and ovarian cancer testing by other companies.
Supreme Court permits patentable cDNA
Several Plaintiffs, including Yale, Columbia, individual patients, and patient advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against Myriad and the University of Utah in May of 2009. The Plaintiffs argued that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they are naturally-occurring. Myriad argued that it isolated the sequences of the DNA and that the Patent Office had issued patents for other companies doing the same thing.
A long legal battle ensued that included two writs of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Circuit twice affirmed that both isolated DNA and cDNA are patentable. Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that only cDNA (synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable. Breast and ovarian cancer screening got much cheaper after the ruling since Myriad no longer owned patents on naturally-occurring genes and thus the testing.
When it was all said and done, the Supreme Court invalidated five of Myriad’s 520 patent claims. Myriad sued competitors for marketing ovarian and breast cancers tests based on the two natural genes after the Supreme Court decision. Ambry Genetics won a case against Myriad in 2014. The company said via press release:
Myriad did not create or alter any of the genetic information encoded in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The location and order of the nucleotides existed in nature before Myriad found them. As the Supreme Court made clear, neither naturally occurring compositions of matter, nor synthetically created compositions that are structurally identical to the naturally occurring compositions, are patent eligible.
Pfizer, Moderna, et al. and your genes
Yes, this article contains a lot of scientific and legal mumbo-jumbo. But in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally-occurring. No mouse is born in nature like the OncoMouse. It is thus patentable. Oil-eating bacteria come from genetic manipulation, thus patentable.
Notice how all these so-called doctors and scientists avoid pointing fingers at Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson et al. when someone dies within hours, days or weeks of receiving their shots. It’s almost as if said doctors and scientists are carefully navigating the trademark and patent landscape. They don’t want to trespass on someone else’s property, if you will. Moderna owns several mRNA patents. Doctors and hospitals wanting a piece of the mRNA pie cannot bite the hand that feeds them.
The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) the shots change your genetic code and 2) the shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19. He says the Moderna shot is “hacking the software of life” (at the 0:43 second mark, but the whole video is…disturbing).
Viral vectors do the same thing.
So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible. Do the math yourself.
The Covid Blog
wait and see for you who are. The Law is the Law
no kidding Christine, what are you trying to say???
Grass is green, there is sand on the beach??
Why are you so rude??
The only hing to fear is fear itself. The entire Globalist program has been to generate fear. Panic because there’s no toilet paper? There was plenty of toilet paper. Kill all our bees because of Verona attacks? There’s always been Verona pests. Bird flu, another plan to kill all our chooks - rubbish bird flu is another generator of fear. Keep your powder dry ‘ till you see the whites of their eyes. The murderous puppeteers drive the timid.
The toxic clowns will likely pull another stunt, probably not far in advance of the USA presidential election.
It is up to the awake (not woke) to tell the clowns where to go. The herd might follow but, then again, maybe not. The herd are more interested in their next Bali pig out, cruise or something.
Based on recent events they ALL have a 'quid pro quo' arrangement with the various governments across the globe.This latest "honest" reporting is just a little tease of what they can/could do, imo. If you want our continued support these are our new terms and conditions, so cough up. Tax breaks anyone? They already know that the "great unwashed" have the attention span of a gnat & personally that's what I'm really afraid of, the mob. The lack of clear thinking, by the majority, is dragging ALL of us into the pen.
Couldn’t agree more Roc. Well said.
Thanks Christine, it's almost suffocating the amount of stupidity we're surrounded by. I would challenge anyone to just sit & watch the people who walk through a shopping centre & think we'll be fine. More pain on its way, I'm afraid. All the best.
Roc. Winston Churchill said that if one wanted to be concerned about democracy, spend 10 mins with the average voter.
My friends and I all unvaxxed are clear thinking and can see huge problems, but others out there? More concerned about the latest idiot reality TV show....
Unfortunately we do have to do “normal” things like shopping. I don’t walk around thinking everything will be fine, quite the opposite-but I doubt anyone could pick up by my face that I know things won’t be fine until something of magnitude changes.
I agree with Jan, and even though Sky News were vocal there was always that “ holding back” element in their reporting. It pays to remember who owns Sky News. So, just enough outrage but never enough punch to endanger the plans of the Globalists.
Was vocal ?
In comparison to the others only.
I notice the blonde in red forgot to mention the role of MSM and how influential they were in destroying lives, blaming, ruficuling, shaming. . She was happy to point the finger at politicians and "society" but omitted to mention how evil the presstitutes were in manipulation and deceit . I wouldnt trust any of those talking heads who think they have the right to turn their personal views into "news" or "current affairs". .
Sky News and Epoch Times are not MSM. The have run stories critical of the vaccines starting in late 2020. They are often disparaged by leftish media outlets for being alt-media or far-right media. Although I think conservative-leaning would be more fair.
I corresponded regularly with Adam Creighton, The Australian journalist throughout covid.
He was grateful for the large amounts of info I supplied, particularly on research articles the protests I attended.
His reporting was excellent and one of the very few telling the truth.
Outsiders and Rowan Dean did not hold back and I believe they were not controlled opposition.
Chris Kenny on the other hand is controlled opposition....
Thank you.
I have found several good Sky News pieces on the scamdemic through Substack, but living in the United States I never paid attention to the individual reporters.
Reading Wikipedia on Chris Kenny, I can see why one would suspect that he is controlled opposition. Then I did a search on DuckDucjGo for his reporting on “Excess deaths” and “Adverse Events.” I came up with one good opinion piece that Sweden did better than Australia when 2022 is included without lockdowns. I expected much more.
I will have to look into the other reporters.
Steve Kirsch and Peter McCullough may or may not be controlled opposition, but they have led to me even better sources of information. I personally think they have their political agendas and biases which make them helpful but limited. I prefer both to Robert Malone, especially after his frivolous lawsuits.