Vaxelis: A new 6-in-1 vaccine containing rDNA and apparently being used on Australia's children
This is just preliminary information. I didn't study rDNA or mRNA either when I went to dinosaur school 100 years ago but I've asked for this to be passed by a geneticist and will have more info soon.
Thank you to both Katie and Charles for sharing this information with me an hour or so ago.
I'm an RN in a GP practice in Australia. Just last week I took delivery of the usual monthly govt. vaccine order, and discovered a new childhood vaccine had been added to the National Immunisation Program (NIP). It's called VAXELIS, and is an "alternative" to Infanrix Hexa, given to babies at 2, 4, and 6 months for DTPa, hepB, polio & HIB."
No doctors or nurses have been given any details about Vaxelis, other than its interchangeability with Infanrix Hexa. So....I checked out the official Product Information for Vaxelis, and found that it's s a ribosomal DNA vaccine.
How DARE they introduce a genetic vaccine into the NIP without telling anyone!
I'm warning every parent that comes in with a baby about it, and I've told the practice manager that I refuse to administer it until the NIP provides details regarding clinical trials, safety data, and an explanation for their underhanded behaviour.
This is bloody ridiculous. Up until 3 years ago, before 𝙖𝙣𝙮 changes to the NIP schedule, all immunisers had to attend some form of education, ie: workshop run by local Public Health, or an online lecture or learning module, usually with an included assessment with an 100% pass mark to attain before being deemed qualified to continue immunising.
Since this whole covid bulldust started, there's been several schedule changes to the NIP, with only a brief email notification, which only benefits the nurse on duty when it arrives, who invariably pins it up on the vax fridge for everyone to ignore.
Considering how fastidious they've been in the past, even with simple schedule changes, this is just bizarre. But the fact that they've actually included a new vaccine into the NIP, and a genetic one to boot, with NO information, NO safety data, NO studies cited, is just bloody criminal!"
This information was shared by @catsscareme2021 with the following additional information:
I looked this up and Vaxelis is a 6 in 1 vaccine that was approved 0ctober 2020. Trials were performed using other vaccines so no saline, per usual. 6 deaths occurred during the trials but they want to assure you it wasn't Vaxelis. You can read all about it for yourself here.
Now, in addition to the American link to information about Vaxelis (above), I’ve been able to find the prescribing information here and the original information from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) here.
Oddly enough, the US Prescribing information, which doctors are supposed to use in order to understand what the ingredients, side effects and contraindications of any drug are does not mention rDNA. But both the TGA and the Australian Prescribing information say it clearly.
Genetically modified ingredients
To the best of my knowledge, our children have been targeted with GMOs in vaccines since the 1980s with the use of the first Hepatitis B vaccinations. In fact, much earlier than that, the use of immortal cell lines in viral vaccines can be said to be genetically-modified and are and always have been associated with a range of serious effects including cancer and autoimmunity.
What I am unclear on is what relationship rDNA has to human health. But not to worry, the fact that it wasn’t tested properly prior to its release - just as every vaccine is virtually untested before their release - means that we will most likely find out sometime in the next 10-20 years anyway.
Parents have a right to know
Just as this nurse was incensed that these things were being included in the schedule without any training or information, parents should also be incredibly angry. Our children are not pHarma’s guinea pigs!
So if you can share this information with everyone you know who has children in the target age group - between 6 weeks and 4 years of age - and let them know the potential issues, that would be great.
I have sought more details and will be updating this as I get them. In the meantime, one important lesson for all of us to remember is that none of the government regulators are our friends. Like the TGA, they are funded by the same corporations they are meant to oversee (the TGA received 98%+ of its operating expenses from the manufacturers of therapeutic goods) and are beholden to their funders rather than to the public that relies on them.
We must always make free and informed choices regarding health and in order to do that, we need to have accurate, unbiased information and evidence. Until that is provided to us, refusing to participate in vaccination schemes is the safest course of action.
NB - thought Vaxelis was indeed approved by the TGA in 2020, it does not appear listed in the most recent vaccination schedule from the Commonwealth found here. One has to wonder why it is being administered without officially being listed on the schedule? (see the pdf file below or the link above)
The rate of death for Vaxelis is terrible: 1/500 infants/toddlers died in their so-called US 'studies' (you know, where they mix and match against other vaccines and no-one ever does saline placebos?). They said the 6 deaths (0.2%) in the 2 US studies weren't related to Vaxelis, but the causes were supposedly SIDS, asphyxia, sepsis, unknown etc. To me, they are all attributable to vaccines!!!
Would YOU take something that has a 1/500 chance of death? And worse, would you give it to your helpless little BABY?!
Let me guess, parents aren't being told there's a 1/500 chance of their kid dying after having Vaxelis jabbed into them. No, they'll be told, if they're told anything at all, that it's not just perfectly safe but that it will SAVE their baby!
Humans do such bad, bad things to other humans, especially their progeny.
Meryl please check your sources on this. I have good reason to believe that this is a false story. It has all the hallmarks
(1) anon source with no documentary verification
(2) attempts to verify fail
(3) tracking the original documentation fails to confirm the claim
(4) the purpose is to bury an underlying story which is likely to be that the fact that there are 6 vaccines in one, and there is no option in Australia to obtain separate vaccinations.
Here is the relevant section from the PDS:
VAXELIS (Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis, Inactivated Poliovirus,
Haemophilus b Conjugate and Hepatitis B Vaccine) is a sterile suspension for intramuscular
injection.
Each 0.5 mL dose is formulated to contain 15 Lf diphtheria toxoid, 5 Lf tetanus toxoid, acellular
pertussis antigens [20 mcg detoxified pertussis toxin (PT), 20 mcg filamentous hemagglutinin
(FHA), 3 mcg pertactin (PRN), 5 mcg fimbriae types 2 and 3 (FIM)], inactivated polioviruses
[29 D-antigen units (DU) Type 1 (Mahoney), 7 DU Type 2 (MEF-1), 26 DU Type 3 (Saukett)],
3 mcg polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) of H. influenzae type b covalently bound to 50 mcg of
the outer membrane protein complex (OMPC) of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B, and
10 mcg hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Each 0.5 mL dose contains 319 mcg aluminum
from aluminum salts used as adjuvants.
Other ingredients per 0.5 mL dose include <0.0056% polysorbate 80 and the following residuals
from the manufacturing process: ≤14 mcg formaldehyde, ≤50 ng glutaraldehyde, ≤50 ng bovine
serum albumin, <5 ng of neomycin, <200 ng streptomycin sulfate, <25 ng polymyxin B sulfate,
≤0.125 μg ammonium thiocyanate and ≤0.1 mcg yeast protein (maximum 1% relative to HBsAg
protein).
Source document here
https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/v/vaxelis/vaxelis_pi.pdf
Source document is verifiable against the TGA site.